diff for duplicates of <4DD9FCFC.10803@hartkopp.net> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index e19a10c..bd3f7aa 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -34,12 +34,7 @@ therefore 21.000 irqs/s) - you are usually designing CAN network traffic with less than 60% busload. So interrupt rates somewhere below 1000 irqs/s can be assumed. - ->From bogus@does.not.exist.com Fri May 20 08:44:36 2011 -From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () -Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:44:36 -0000 -Subject: No subject -Message-ID: <mailman.1.1306131711.23796.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> +>From what i've seen so far a 3-4 messages rx FIFO and NAPI support just make it. @Marc/Wolfgang: Would this be also your recommendation for a CAN controller design that supports SocketCAN in the best way? diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 2b92899..400f4b5 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,10 +2,22 @@ "ref\04DCB88A4.2010901@grandegger.com\0" "ref\04DCBF1B6.6000104@hartkopp.net\0" "ref\0201105221230.56243.arnd@arndb.de\0" - "From\0socketcan@hartkopp.net (Oliver Hartkopp)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v4 1/1] can: add pruss CAN driver.\0" + "From\0Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] can: add pruss CAN driver.\0" "Date\0Mon, 23 May 2011 08:21:48 +0200\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>\0" + "Cc\0Subhasish Ghosh <subhasish@mistralsolutions.com>" + Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com> + sachi@mistralsolutions.com + davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com + nsekhar@ti.com + open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + CAN NETWORK DRIVERS <socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de> + Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + Netdev@vger.kernel.org + m-watkins@ti.com + " Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 22.05.2011 12:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote:\n" @@ -44,12 +56,7 @@ "less than 60% busload. So interrupt rates somewhere below 1000 irqs/s can be\n" "assumed.\n" "\n" - "\n" - ">From bogus@does.not.exist.com Fri May 20 08:44:36 2011\n" - "From: bogus@does.not.exist.com ()\n" - "Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:44:36 -0000\n" - "Subject: No subject\n" - "Message-ID: <mailman.1.1306131711.23796.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\n" + ">From what i've seen so far a 3-4 messages rx FIFO and NAPI support just make it.\n" "\n" "@Marc/Wolfgang: Would this be also your recommendation for a CAN controller\n" "design that supports SocketCAN in the best way?\n" @@ -67,4 +74,4 @@ "> \n" "> \tArnd" -7a42e09e28a2456ac8cc775ba84739b32489fb097c7e725f95366dabc28652f7 +38e4cb57379e9a419bdc32b018a8830e23f44363c014d37943391a36a60276b7
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index e19a10c..bd3f7aa 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -34,12 +34,7 @@ therefore 21.000 irqs/s) - you are usually designing CAN network traffic with less than 60% busload. So interrupt rates somewhere below 1000 irqs/s can be assumed. - ->From bogus@does.not.exist.com Fri May 20 08:44:36 2011 -From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () -Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:44:36 -0000 -Subject: No subject -Message-ID: <mailman.1.1306131711.23796.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> +>From what i've seen so far a 3-4 messages rx FIFO and NAPI support just make it. @Marc/Wolfgang: Would this be also your recommendation for a CAN controller design that supports SocketCAN in the best way? diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 2b92899..dfb390d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -2,10 +2,23 @@ "ref\04DCB88A4.2010901@grandegger.com\0" "ref\04DCBF1B6.6000104@hartkopp.net\0" "ref\0201105221230.56243.arnd@arndb.de\0" - "From\0socketcan@hartkopp.net (Oliver Hartkopp)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v4 1/1] can: add pruss CAN driver.\0" + "ref\0201105221230.56243.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org\0" + "From\0Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] can: add pruss CAN driver.\0" "Date\0Mon, 23 May 2011 08:21:48 +0200\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>\0" + "Cc\0sachi-EvXpCiN+lbve9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org" + davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org + Alan Cox <alan-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> + Subhasish Ghosh <subhasish-EvXpCiN+lbve9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> + nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org + open list <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> + CAN NETWORK DRIVERS <socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org> + Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> + linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org + Netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + m-watkins-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org + " Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 22.05.2011 12:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote:\n" @@ -44,12 +57,7 @@ "less than 60% busload. So interrupt rates somewhere below 1000 irqs/s can be\n" "assumed.\n" "\n" - "\n" - ">From bogus@does.not.exist.com Fri May 20 08:44:36 2011\n" - "From: bogus@does.not.exist.com ()\n" - "Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:44:36 -0000\n" - "Subject: No subject\n" - "Message-ID: <mailman.1.1306131711.23796.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\n" + ">From what i've seen so far a 3-4 messages rx FIFO and NAPI support just make it.\n" "\n" "@Marc/Wolfgang: Would this be also your recommendation for a CAN controller\n" "design that supports SocketCAN in the best way?\n" @@ -67,4 +75,4 @@ "> \n" "> \tArnd" -7a42e09e28a2456ac8cc775ba84739b32489fb097c7e725f95366dabc28652f7 +3650e0aed0c3679ddcdc21e60b1231d354bfd33071e02b95887a5d8f5bd0a3dd
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.