From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Fehlig Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxc: use correct macro when unmapping memory after save operation Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:25:53 -0600 Message-ID: <4DDBBFF1.4050905@novell.com> References: <4DD6E579.7060304@novell.com> <19931.47489.431098.743040@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19931.47489.431098.743040@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Jackson wrote: > Jim Fehlig writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: use correct macro when unmapping memory after save operation"): > >> With some help from Olaf, I've finally got to the bottom of an issue I >> came across while trying to implement save/restore in the libvirt >> libxenlight driver. After issuing the save operation, the saved domain >> was not being cleaned up properly and left in this state from xl's >> perspective >> > > Good catch, thanks. I have applied this. > > Next time, though, can you please be sure to add a Signed-off-by line, > Yes, apologies for the oversight. BTW, thanks for the commit message note about "backporting to relevant earlier trees". I was going to ask that this be applied to 4.1-testing. Should such a statement be included for fixes that apply to multiple trees? Is it helpful for scanning potential backports in -unstable? Regards, Jim