From: "Nicolas de Pesloüan" <nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <daevm@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: prevent deadlock on slave store with alb mode
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:13:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDC116F.8020602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110524200047.GI21309@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Le 24/05/2011 22:00, Andy Gospodarek a écrit :
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 03:36:05PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>> This soft lockup was recently reported:
>>
>> [root@dell-per715-01 ~]# echo +bond5> /sys/class/net/bonding_masters
>> [root@dell-per715-01 ~]# echo +eth1> /sys/class/net/bond5/bonding/slaves
>> bonding: bond5: doing slave updates when interface is down.
>> bonding bond5: master_dev is not up in bond_enslave
>> [root@dell-per715-01 ~]# echo -eth1> /sys/class/net/bond5/bonding/slaves
>> bonding: bond5: doing slave updates when interface is down.
>>
>> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#12 stuck for 60s! [bash:6444]
>> CPU 12:
>> Modules linked in: bonding autofs4 hidp rfcomm l2cap bluetooth lockd sunrpc
>> be2d
>> Pid: 6444, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.18-262.el5 #1
>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff80064bf0>] [<ffffffff80064bf0>]
>> .text.lock.spinlock+0x26/00
>> RSP: 0018:ffff810113167da8 EFLAGS: 00000286
>> RAX: ffff810113167fd8 RBX: ffff810123a47800 RCX: 0000000000ff1025
>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff810123a47800 RDI: ffff81021b57f6f8
>> RBP: ffff81021b57f500 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000c
>> R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: ffff81011d41c000 R12: ffff81021b57f000
>> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000282 R15: 0000000000000282
>> FS: 00002b3b41ef3f50(0000) GS:ffff810123b27940(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>> CR2: 00002b3b456dd000 CR3: 000000031fc60000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>>
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff80064af9>] _spin_lock_bh+0x9/0x14
>> [<ffffffff886937d7>] :bonding:tlb_clear_slave+0x22/0xa1
>> [<ffffffff8869423c>] :bonding:bond_alb_deinit_slave+0xba/0xf0
>> [<ffffffff8868dda6>] :bonding:bond_release+0x1b4/0x450
>> [<ffffffff8006457b>] __down_write_nested+0x12/0x92
>> [<ffffffff88696ae4>] :bonding:bonding_store_slaves+0x25c/0x2f7
>> [<ffffffff801106f7>] sysfs_write_file+0xb9/0xe8
>> [<ffffffff80016b87>] vfs_write+0xce/0x174
>> [<ffffffff80017450>] sys_write+0x45/0x6e
>> [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0
>>
>> It occurs because we are able to change the slave configuarion of a bond while
>> the bond interface is down. The bonding driver initializes some data structures
>> only after its ndo_open routine is called. Among them is the initalization of
>> the alb tx and rx hash locks. So if we add or remove a slave without first
>> opening the bond master device, we run the risk of trying to lock/unlock a
>> spinlock that has garbage for data in it, which results in our above softlock.
>>
>> We could fix it by moving the spin lock initalization to the device creation
>> path, but it seems that since we're warning people about not doing this, we
>> should probably just disallow them from doing it, so fix it by adding an EINVAL
>> return if we're not up yet. Tested by the reporter and confirmed to fix the
>> problem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman<nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek<andy@greyhouse.net>
>
>> Reported-by: jtluka@redhat.com
>> CC: Jay Vosburgh<fubar@us.ibm.com>
>> CC: Andy Gospodarek<andy@greyhouse.net>
>> CC: "David S. Miller"<daevm@davemloft.net>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>> index 4059bfc..206c543 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_slaves(struct device *d,
>> if (!(bond->dev->flags& IFF_UP)) {
>> pr_warning("%s: doing slave updates when interface is down.\n",
>> bond->dev->name);
>> + return -EINVAL;
This will turn a warning into an error.
This warning existed for long, but never caused the bonding setup to fail. This patch cause some
regression for user space. For example, current ifenslave-2.6 package in Debian doesn't ensure bond
is UP before enslaving, because this was never required.
NAK.
>> }
>>
>> if (!rtnl_trylock())
>> --
>> 1.7.5.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 19:36 [PATCH] bonding: prevent deadlock on slave store with alb mode Neil Horman
2011-05-24 20:00 ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-05-24 20:13 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan [this message]
2011-05-24 20:37 ` Neil Horman
2011-05-24 20:51 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-05-24 21:02 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-05-24 21:12 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-05-24 21:14 ` David Miller
2011-05-24 21:32 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-05-24 23:18 ` Neil Horman
2011-05-25 0:34 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-05-25 2:20 ` Neil Horman
2011-05-25 7:33 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-05-25 17:16 ` [PATCH] bonding: prevent deadlock on slave store with alb mode (v2) Neil Horman
2011-05-25 17:32 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-05-25 21:58 ` David Miller
2011-05-25 18:13 ` [PATCH] bonding: prevent deadlock on slave store with alb mode (v3) Neil Horman
2011-05-25 18:59 ` Jay Vosburgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDC116F.8020602@gmail.com \
--to=nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=daevm@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.