From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPH6e-0008S1-0Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 12:38:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPH6d-0001Hc-8N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 12:38:47 -0400 Received: from nog.sh.bytemark.co.uk ([212.110.161.168]:40222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPH6d-0001HM-4C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 12:38:47 -0400 Received: from bytemail.bytemark.co.uk ([212.110.161.227]) by nog.sh.bytemark.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QP9Zf-0006iy-Bs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 09:36:15 +0100 Received: from desk4.office.bytemark.co.uk ([89.16.168.152]) by bytemail.bytemark.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QP9Zf-0007zv-5W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 09:36:15 +0100 Message-ID: <4DDCBF7E.3080601@bytemark.co.uk> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 09:36:14 +0100 From: Alex Young MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4DDB7258.5010603@bytemark.co.uk> <4DDBFAC3.9060204@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4DDBFAC3.9060204@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 9p and savevm'd snapshots List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 24/05/11 19:36, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 05/24/2011 03:54 AM, Alex Young wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I'm having a problem with 9p virtfs mounts going away when I savevm, >> quit, then restart with -loadvm. The mount seems to cause the guest >> kernel to hang if I interact with it in any way that causes a stat(2). >> I'm also unable to mount a 9p filesystem after a snapshot restart. >> >> Is this expected, or should they work? I'm using qemu version 0.14.50, >> and this happens at least with kernel versions 2.6.32 and 2.6.38 in a >> Debian Squeeze guest. > > virtio-9p doesn't currently support savevm which means it doesn't work > with migration or savevm/loadvm. > Ah, thanks. Is that a "can never work with the current implementation," or "can work but nobody's got round to it yet"? -- Alex