From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from daytona.panasas.com ([67.152.220.89]:28430 "EHLO daytona.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932087Ab1EYNiy (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 09:38:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4DDD0675.9080900@panasas.com> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:39:01 +0300 From: Boaz Harrosh To: Benny Halevy CC: Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 20/26] pnfs-obj: osd raid engine read/write implementation References: <4DDA8C3D.5080706@panasas.com> <1306168699-11685-1-git-send-email-bhalevy@panasas.com> In-Reply-To: <1306168699-11685-1-git-send-email-bhalevy@panasas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Benny hi! I've implemented and tested the new schema we talked about with max IO sizes and pg_test. (Just for debugging I removed the check for bsize in the pnfs case). It works grate. If you have anything send it so I can test it. Meanwhile you can SQUASH this one as well, it will not hurt. (Sent as reply to this mail) I have couple more nit patches, that remove or move some prints if that's OK? I'll send them as reply to the patches they go into. Do you want to send one more clean round (V8). before linux-next? Boaz