From: Fyodor Ustinov <ufm@ufm.su>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: fuse vs kernel client
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 23:19:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDD646E.4090105@ufm.su> (raw)
Hi!
It's me again (I feel like that I'm here soon banned :)
ceph have fuse client and kernel client.
Why are two of them?
Which is better?
WBR,
Fyodor.
next reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-25 20:19 Fyodor Ustinov [this message]
2011-05-25 20:35 ` fuse vs kernel client Wido den Hollander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDD646E.4090105@ufm.su \
--to=ufm@ufm.su \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.