From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pv0-f176.google.com (mail-pv0-f176.google.com [74.125.83.176]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD9B4C80A72 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 19:54:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so126850pve.35 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.35.33 with SMTP id e1mr84788pbj.305.1306371270100; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (c-67-187-204-11.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.187.204.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y3sm402766pbg.24.2011.05.25.17.54.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 25 May 2011 17:54:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DDDA4BF.5010503@mvista.com> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 17:54:23 -0700 From: Jeremy Puhlman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yocto Mailer X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:20:57 -0500 Cc: dvhart@linux.intel.com Subject: In consistancy in the defition of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 00:54:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I was working with some layerinfo code, and I noticed that the value of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf in the meta-intel repo are kind of all over the map: for each in */conf/layer.conf; do cat $each; done | grep BBFILE_COLLECTIONS BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_crownbay += "crownbay" BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_crownbay-noemgd += "crownbay-noemgd" BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_fishriver += "fishriver" BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_jasperforest += "jasperforest" BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_sugarbay += "sugarbay" For the above layers when I just list out oe-core and one of the above, the results from BBFILE_COLLECTIONS ends up just being what ever was set above. BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "n450" BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "emenlow" When using these layers, the final BBFILE_COLLECTIONS is the list of all the layers as expected. Was just curious if there was a intentional reason why the difference(i.e. is there some code that I am missing that fixes this up)? -- Jeremy Puhlman Montavista Sofware, LLC.