From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Igor Grinberg Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap updates for 2.6.40 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 15:52:20 +0300 Message-ID: <4DDE4D04.5070404@compulab.co.il> References: <20110526113905.GG27250@atomide.com> <4DDE441C.2080808@compulab.co.il> <20110526122412.GB11352@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110526122412.GB11352@atomide.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 05/26/11 15:24, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Igor Grinberg [110526 05:10]: >> What about this one: [PATCH v2] arm: omap2plus: move NAND_BLOCK_SIZE out of boards >> >> Why not include it? It is no new code, just generalize stuff and 11 lines off... not much but still. > Sorry I must have missed it.. Let's see if we can queue it > during the merge window as it's a trivial patch removing > duplicate defines. I'm failing to understand what do you mean by that... According to Linus ("probably Sunday - I'll be on airplanes next Monday"), the merge window will be closed soon. Do you mean, you will send an updated pull request? -- Regards, Igor. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grinberg@compulab.co.il (Igor Grinberg) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 15:52:20 +0300 Subject: [GIT PULL] omap updates for 2.6.40 In-Reply-To: <20110526122412.GB11352@atomide.com> References: <20110526113905.GG27250@atomide.com> <4DDE441C.2080808@compulab.co.il> <20110526122412.GB11352@atomide.com> Message-ID: <4DDE4D04.5070404@compulab.co.il> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/26/11 15:24, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Igor Grinberg [110526 05:10]: >> What about this one: [PATCH v2] arm: omap2plus: move NAND_BLOCK_SIZE out of boards >> >> Why not include it? It is no new code, just generalize stuff and 11 lines off... not much but still. > Sorry I must have missed it.. Let's see if we can queue it > during the merge window as it's a trivial patch removing > duplicate defines. I'm failing to understand what do you mean by that... According to Linus ("probably Sunday - I'll be on airplanes next Monday"), the merge window will be closed soon. Do you mean, you will send an updated pull request? -- Regards, Igor.