[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/4] ocfs2: bugfix for hard readonly mount

[Tristan Ye <tristan.ye@oracle.com>]

On 05/27/2011 12:03 AM, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 02:40 AM, Tiger Yang wrote:
>> These four patches are all related to ocfs2 on hard readonly mount.
>> patch 1 fix oops when umount ocfs2 on hard readonly device.
>> Because ocfs2_dismount_volume() will call ocfs2_cluster_hangup() and
>> then call ocfs2_stack_driver_put(), will hit BUG_ON(active_stack ==
>> NULL).
>>
>> patch 2 fix oops when do ls or cat in ocfs2 on hard readonly device.
>> Because ocfs2_open_lock() will call ocfs2_cluster_lock() and then call
>> ocfs2_dlm_lock(), but active_stack is NULL.
>>
>> patch 3 fix bug of http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1322
>> ocfs2_statfs, ocfs2_fiemap, ocfs2_get_acl, ocfs2_listxattr and
>> ocfs2_xattr_get need ocfs2_inode_lock to get dinode buffer head, but
>> on hard readonly mount, they did not get they expected, so lead to
>> oops. ocfs2_init_security_and_acl and ocfs2_test_inode_bit also called
>> ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, &bh, 0), but they are safe, because 
>> ocfs2_reflink and ocfs2_get_dentry  check hard read only before them.
>>
>> patch 4 fix problem of running ls on hard readonly mount  can't get
>> the right result.
>> Because ocfs2_dentry_lock() return -EROFS. It should return 0.
> 
> Tiger, Thanks. Was this tested with all fs-features enabled? I am
> worried about quotas. If not, please test that.
> 
> Tristan, Please can you cross check these patches. Enable all features
> in a volume, make it readonly and do mount, ls -lR, umount, read, stat,
> stat -f. This calls for a test script. We should be able to use loopback.
> losetup -rf.

Sure,

I'm going to write a dedicated script for sanity check, including these
generic fs syscalls.

Tristan


> 
> Thanks
> Sunil