From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 63.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.56]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QQwum-0000jo-8p for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 09:29:28 +0200 Received: (qmail 18086 invoked by uid 503); 30 May 2011 08:15:06 -0000 Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail182.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 63.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 30 May 2011 08:15:06 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 30 May 2011 09:19:38 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 30 May 2011 09:19:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4DE34507.2090107@eukrea.com> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 09:19:35 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <53EA452E-5E40-471F-8AF7-BE8303945241@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <53EA452E-5E40-471F-8AF7-BE8303945241@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 4974225788907007426 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N Subject: Re: Any volunteers for fixing all the kernel version checks? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 07:29:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 30/05/2011 08:52, Koen Kooi wrote: > As some of you might have seen already: http://lwn.net/Articles/445223/ - linux 3.0 is going to happen. > > This means all the crufty "is it 2.4 or 2.6" checks are going to need a rework :) Does supporting 2.4 kernels still makes sense in 2011 ? Eric