From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS4: Fix secondary CPU boot after wake-up Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:08:17 +0530 Message-ID: <4DE36589.4080709@ti.com> References: <1306746781-21511-1-git-send-email-inderpal.s@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog115.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.238]:45297 "EHLO na3sys009aog115.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754783Ab1E3JiZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2011 05:38:25 -0400 Received: by ywp31 with SMTP id 31so1506200ywp.3 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 02:38:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1306746781-21511-1-git-send-email-inderpal.s@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Inderpal Singh , Russell King Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Inderpal Singh , kgene.kim@samsung.com, samsung@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org On 5/30/2011 2:43 PM, Inderpal Singh wrote: [...] > 2. Fix to remove the "Unknown IPI message 0x1" message when > secondary CPU boots. > For this one you are avoiding a wakeup IPI and rather relying on schedule IPI. That just avoiding the issue. This doesn't seems to be right. Refer below thread. http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg110886.html Russell, When do you plan to fix the SGI usage as discussed in above thread. I thought SGI1 usage was ok for OMAP, realview/versatile and MSM. Regards Santosh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:08:17 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS4: Fix secondary CPU boot after wake-up In-Reply-To: <1306746781-21511-1-git-send-email-inderpal.s@samsung.com> References: <1306746781-21511-1-git-send-email-inderpal.s@samsung.com> Message-ID: <4DE36589.4080709@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 5/30/2011 2:43 PM, Inderpal Singh wrote: [...] > 2. Fix to remove the "Unknown IPI message 0x1" message when > secondary CPU boots. > For this one you are avoiding a wakeup IPI and rather relying on schedule IPI. That just avoiding the issue. This doesn't seems to be right. Refer below thread. http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg110886.html Russell, When do you plan to fix the SGI usage as discussed in above thread. I thought SGI1 usage was ok for OMAP, realview/versatile and MSM. Regards Santosh