From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:57000 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752439Ab1EaJBy (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2011 05:01:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4DE4AE80.9040904@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 11:01:52 +0200 From: Michal Marek MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] kbuild: Fix for X.Y versions References: <1306767052-15593-1-git-send-email-mmarek@suse.cz> <1306767052-15593-3-git-send-email-mmarek@suse.cz> <5164.1306768129@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <5164.1306768129@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 30.5.2011 17:08, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Mon, 30 May 2011 16:50:50 +0200, Michal Marek said: > >> + expr $(VERSION) \* 65536 + $(PATCHLEVEL) \* 256 + 0$(SUBLEVEL)); \ > > expr isn't going to interpret that last field as octal, is it? As I wrote in the changelog: "expr treats all numbers as decimals, so prepending a zero is safe." POSIX requires this, FWIW. Michal