From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mihai Moldovan Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:36:36 +0200 Subject: [ath9k-devel] AR9380 + hostapd + HT over 802.11a Message-ID: <4DE52724.2040300@ionic.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Hey all, I'm having a "problem" again. ;) Today I got my AR9380 card and wanted to set it up on 802.11a (5GHz) with HT40 (802.11n). Although enabling 802.11d and setting the regulatory domain to "DE" (Germany), I wasn't able to bring up the card on any 5GHz channel in AP mode. Finding some "patch" for ath9k which disabled NO_IBSS, RADAR_SCANNING and PASSIVE_SCAN, I was able to bring the card up on 5GHz with HT (and finally get 300MBit max rate.) I feel that's the wrong approach and would like to ask how to really do this kind of stuff. Also: as the card is currently running on 5GHz, I'd like to put another card up running on 2.4GHz for legacy hardware not capable of 802.11a (for instance my Android phone.) Is there anything I should pay attention to? For instance using another ESSID and (naturally) using some 2.4GHz channel. In my experience, running two cards on the same ESSID on different channels doesn't work well and confuses STAs, leading to connection drops and unrecoverable states. Any help is highly appreciated. Best regards, Mihai -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 6111 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20110531/0b618272/attachment.bin