From: liubo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [3.0-rc1] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4285!
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:12:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE5F450.9000506@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE5EDF0.4030601@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 06/01/2011 03:44 PM, liubo wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 08:27 AM, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
>> > The panic occurred when 'btrfs fi bal /test5' was executed.
>> >
>> > /test5 is as follows:
>> > # mount -o space_cache,compress=lzo /dev/sdc3 /test5
>> > #
>> > # btrfs fi sh /dev/sdc3
>> > Label: none uuid: 38ec48b2-a64b-4225-8cc6-5eb08024dc64
>> > Total devices 5 FS bytes used 7.87MB
>> > devid 1 size 10.00GB used 2.02GB path /dev/sdc3
>> > devid 2 size 15.01GB used 3.00GB path /dev/sdc5
>> > devid 3 size 15.01GB used 3.00GB path /dev/sdc6
>> > devid 4 size 20.01GB used 2.01GB path /dev/sdc7
>> > devid 5 size 10.00GB used 2.01GB path /dev/sdc8
>> >
>> > Btrfs v0.19-50-ge6bd18d
>> > # btrfs fi df /test5
>> > Data, RAID0: total=10.00GB, used=3.52MB
>> > Data: total=8.00MB, used=1.60MB
>> > System, RAID1: total=8.00MB, used=4.00KB
>> > System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
>> > Metadata, RAID1: total=1.00GB, used=216.00KB
>> > Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00
>> >
>
> Hi, Itoh san,
>
> I've come up with a patch aiming to fix this bug.
> The problems is that the inode allocator stores one inode cache per root,
> which is at least not good for relocation tree, cause we only find
> new inode number from fs tree or file tree (subvol/snapshot).
>
> I've tested with your run.sh and it works well on my box, so you can try this:
>
Sorry, I messed up BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID and BTRFS_LAST_FREE_OBJECTID,
plz ignore this.
> ===
> based on 3.0, commit d6c0cb379c5198487e4ac124728cbb2346d63b1f
> ===
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c b/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c
> index 0009705..ebc2a7b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c
> @@ -372,6 +372,10 @@ int btrfs_save_ino_cache(struct btrfs_root *root,
> int prealloc;
> bool retry = false;
>
> + if (root->root_key.objectid != BTRFS_FS_TREE_OBJECTID &&
> + root->root_key.objectid < BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
> + return 0;
> +
> path = btrfs_alloc_path();
> if (!path)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
>
>
> thanks,
> liubo
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 0:27 [3.0-rc1] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4285! Tsutomu Itoh
2011-05-31 1:13 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-31 4:31 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-05-31 6:13 ` liubo
2011-05-31 6:58 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-06-01 7:44 ` liubo
2011-06-01 8:12 ` liubo [this message]
2011-06-01 9:42 ` liubo
2011-06-01 10:44 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-06-06 1:20 ` Tsutomu Itoh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DE5F450.9000506@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.