All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Drew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH linux-2.6.18-xen] pciback: clean up	 (MSI-X vec, entrynr) list when resetting PCI device
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:16:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE665FA.2040104@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE66FDF0200007800044EC7@vpn.id2.novell.com>

On 06/01/2011 04:59 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The problem is that calling disable_msi_mode() alone is always a
> mistake, this should have been a static function just like its
> counterpart, enable_msi_mode().

MSI has been almost rewritten in the 2.6.21 timeframe, including along
the lines you wrote above:

commit b1cbf4e4dddd708ba268c3a2bf38383a269d490a
Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date:   Mon Mar 5 00:30:10 2007 -0800

    [PATCH] msi: fix up the msi enable/disable logic
    
    enable/disable_msi_mode have several side effects which keeps them from being
    generally useful.  So this patch replaces them with with two much more
    targeted functions: msi_set_enable and msix_set_enable.
    
    This patch makes pci_dev->msi_enabled and pci_dev->msix_enabled the definitive
    way to test if linux has enabled the msi capability, and has the appropriate
    msi data structures set up.

commit f5f2b13129a6541debf8851bae843cbbf48298b7
Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date:   Mon Mar 5 00:30:07 2007 -0800

    [PATCH] msi: sanely support hardware level msi disabling
    
    In some cases when we are not using msi we need a way to ensure that the
    hardware does not have an msi capability enabled.  Currently the code has been
    calling disable_msi_mode to try and achieve that.  However disable_msi_mode
    has several other side effects and is only available when msi support is
    compiled in so it isn't really appropriate.

commit 866a8c87c4e51046602387953bbef76992107bcb
Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date:   Sun Jan 28 12:45:54 2007 -0700

    msi: Fix msi_remove_pci_irq_vectors.
    
    Since msi_remove_pci_irq_vectors is designed to be called during
    hotplug remove it is actively wrong to query the hardware and expect
    meaningful results back.
    
    To that end remove the pci_find_capability calls.  Testing
    dev->msi_enabled and dev->msix_enabled gives us all of the information
    we need.

Probably the situation needs to be re-evaluated with all these applied to dom0.
There's some hope these apply to 2.6.18.

A simple "git log drivers/pci/msi.c" will show a few other patches that the
above might depend on (especially the locking changed).

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-01 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-01 10:05 [RFC PATCH linux-2.6.18-xen] pciback: clean up (MSI-X vec, entrynr) list when resetting PCI device Laszlo Ersek
2011-06-01 11:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-06-01 14:31   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-01 16:18     ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-06-01 17:32     ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-06-01 18:13       ` 2.6.38 (FC15) with PCI passthrough fails mysteriously with iommu=soft Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-02  7:42         ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-06-02 20:49         ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-06-01 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH linux-2.6.18-xen] pciback: clean up (MSI-X vec, entrynr) list when resetting PCI device Jan Beulich
2011-06-01 14:12   ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-06-01 14:59     ` Jan Beulich
2011-06-01 15:27       ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-06-01 16:07         ` Jan Beulich
2011-06-01 16:25           ` Andrew Jones
2011-06-01 16:27             ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-06-01 16:16       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2011-06-01 14:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-01 15:01   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DE665FA.2040104@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.