From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [PATCH] asoc atmel_ssc: Don't try to free ssc if request failed Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:11:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4DE7D23A.505@ti.com> References: <20110602180540.GA4227@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com (arroyo.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.40]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A170244B7 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:11:12 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20110602180540.GA4227@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Joachim Eastwood , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 02/06/11 19:05, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:59:10PM +0200, Joachim Eastwood wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Patch below fixes a segmentation fault in atmel_ssc_dai if ssc_request() fails. >> >> We should only call ssc_free() when ssc_request() succeeds or bad >> things will happen. > > Adding Liam for his review. Please CC maintainers on patches. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Joachim Eastwood Acked-by: Liam Girdwood