From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Heyer Subject: Re: Wifi switch not working, linux on IdeaPad S205 Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:49:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4DE8D876.7060304@flanto.de> References: <4DE5FD4D020000230002D5D4@novprvlin0050.provo.novell.com> <4DE57CD6.5030609@flanto.de> <4DE62BA2020000230002D603@novprvlin0050.provo.novell.com> <4DE74CEF.3020608@flanto.de> <4DE86E36020000230002D768@novprvlin0050.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from melmac.flanto.de ([78.46.67.50]:50780 "EHLO melmac.flanto.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754701Ab1FCMt6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:49:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4DE86E36020000230002D768@novprvlin0050.provo.novell.com> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Joey Lee Cc: ike.pan@canonical.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org On 02.06.2011 21:16, Joey Lee wrote: > This is a problem on "Fn+F5" and "wireless hardware switch", does "Fn > +F5" also can control wireless state? If yes, then it's a problem it > have conflict with "wirelss hardware switch". > > I mean, even 0x0C is "64", the Fn+F5 still can turn-off wireless, does > it right? > If the answer is yes, then we cann't use 0x0C to be killswitch state. fn+f5 doesn't do anything no matter what state the wifi switch is. Personally i wouldn't mind if only the wifi switch is supported, i mean, you don't need a key combination if you have a real switch for wifi (de)activation. > What the value in 0x51 and 0x52? is 0, 1 or? It's 0! regards -- Florian Heyer - heyho@flanto.de