From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 64.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.65]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QSy2M-0002Wa-Ot for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 23:05:38 +0200 Received: (qmail 9293 invoked by uid 503); 4 Jun 2011 20:22:10 -0000 Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail26.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 64.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 4 Jun 2011 20:22:10 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 4 Jun 2011 22:54:50 +0200 Received: from tal33-3-82-233-81-124.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.2.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.233.81.124) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 4 Jun 2011 22:54:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4DEA9B99.1000507@eukrea.com> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:54:49 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1307209126.4456.21.camel@mattotaupa> <1307210460.4456.24.camel@mattotaupa> In-Reply-To: X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 11211992748930280777 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.233.81.124 (tal33-3-82-233-81-124.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "busybox_1.18.4.bb: Fix checksums of busybox-1.18.4-hush.patch" X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:05:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/06/2011 20:05, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04-06-11 20:01, Paul Menzel wrote: > >> Another solution would be to handle all patches in OpenEmbedded >> directly. > > That is what I have been saying for a while now... that's what was initially done but I was asked to change to remotely fetched patches which can create this trouble if busybox's patches are updated. Eric