All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Mysterious CFQ crash and RCU
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:51:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DEC085E.3080506@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307270324.25014.14.camel@t41.thuisdomein>

On 2011-06-05 12:38, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 10:39 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> 0) I'd guess not, as the last thing I tried before simply ripping
>> io_context.ioc_data out, was:
>>
>>         spin_lock_irqsave(&ioc->lock, flags);
>>         rcu_read_lock();
>>         ioc_data = rcu_dereference(ioc->ioc_data);
>>         rcu_read_unlock();
>>         if (ioc_data == cic)
>>                 rcu_assign_pointer(ioc->ioc_data, NULL);
>>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->lock, flags);

You don't need to nest a rcu_read_lock/unlock() inside that write lock.

> 0) Strike that. It does seem to fix it. I must have done something silly
> while doing yet another test of this stuff (perhaps by forgetting to
> remove an old, crashing version of the cfq_iosched module before
> installing a new version and switching back to cfq).

Good, I thought it should!

> 1) Jens, I suggest I'll send in a small series of patches, along these
> lines:
> - cleanup: make two functions static in block/cfq-iosched.c
> - cleanup: rename io_context.cic_list -> io_context.cic_hlist
>            rename io_context.ioc_data -> io_context.last_cic
>            change io_context.last_cic from void* to cfq_io_context* 
>            rename cfq_io_context.cic_list -> cfq_io_context.cic_node
> - cleanup: rename *ret -> *ioc in two functions
> - locking: make sure io_context.last_cic is accessed under
>            io_context.lock and using the required RCU voodoo
> 
> 2) Any objections beforehand?

I've already applied the fix I sent to you, since it was definitely a
bug. So please send anything around that. Was out today, so not pushed
out until now and just now catching up on the email.

And thanks a ton for being persistent and doing a ton of work trying to
figure out what was wrong. Fixing is the easy part, illuminating where
the problem is or may be is the hard part!

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-05 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-19 22:24 Mysterious CFQ crash and RCU Vivek Goyal
2011-05-21 21:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-21 22:23   ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-21 23:54     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-22 19:30       ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-22 20:13         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-23 15:21   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-23 15:38     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-23 22:20       ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-24  4:14         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24  9:41         ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-24 14:35           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24 14:51             ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-24 15:42               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24 15:51                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25  8:28           ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25  8:46             ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25  9:13               ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25  9:30                 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25  9:40                   ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25 12:48               ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25 12:51                 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 17:28               ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25 18:59                 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 10:17       ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25 15:33         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 17:44           ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25 20:40             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-26  9:15       ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-03  5:07         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-03 13:45           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-03 15:33             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-03 16:54               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-04 12:22             ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-04 12:50           ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-04 16:03             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-04 22:48               ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-04 23:06                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-04 15:05                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-04 19:43                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-08-04 19:51                       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-05  6:56                 ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-05  8:39                   ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-05 10:38                   ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-05 22:51                     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-06-06 14:28                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-23 15:36   ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DEC085E.3080506@fusionio.com \
    --to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.