Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/10] bcm47xx: fix irq assignment for new SoCs.

[Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>]

Hello.

On 06-06-2011 2:07, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens<hauke@hauke-m.de>
> ---
>   arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c |    8 ++++++++
>   1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c
> index 325757a..3642cee 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c
[...]
> @@ -51,5 +52,12 @@ void plat_irq_dispatch(void)
>
>   void __init arch_init_irq(void)
>   {
> +	if (bcm47xx_active_bus_type == BCM47XX_BUS_TYPE_BCMA) {
> +		bcma_write32(bcm47xx_bus.bcma.drv_mips.core,
> +			     BCMA_MIPS_MIPS74K_INTMASK(5), 1<<  31);
> +		/* the kernel reads the timer irq from some register and thinks
> +		 * it's #5, but we offset it by 2 and route to #7 */

    The preferred style for the multi-line comments is this:

/*
  * bla
  * bla
  */

WBR, Sergei