From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: Specify target bias state directly as a bias state Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:35:01 +0100 Message-ID: <4DED2BE5.7050205@ti.com> References: <1307367706-1325-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com (arroyo.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.40]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188E4243AA for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:35:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1307367706-1325-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 06/06/11 14:41, Mark Brown wrote: > Rather than a simple flag to say if we want the DAPM context to be at full > power specify the target bias state. This should have no current effect > but is a bit more direct and so makes it easier to change our decisions > about the which bias state to go into in future. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Both Acked-by: Liam Girdwood