From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <andreas.faerber@web.de>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] inconsistency between device traversal in qdev and legacy
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:19:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DEFBD34.1050507@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=BT=mWypNvmoSOPV_W1Pn8T-eEwg@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/08/2011 12:39 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 June 2011 18:37, Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@web.de> wrote:
>> From Peter's description I believe this could be the root cause of Rob's
>> reversed -net /dev/ethX devices as well? That supposedly broke with 0.14. So
>> for setups earlier than 0.14 reversing would be a bugfix, but if people
>> adapted to 0.14 behavior changing it back would break things. Difficult
>> call.
>
> OTOH if not many people complained about the 0.13->0.14 transition then
> presumably not very many will complain if we put it back? :-)
>
> -- PMM
I suspect most people emulating boards only feed one interface to the
thing, so it probably doesn't come up much.
Either way, I have a workaround now, but consistency would be nice.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-08 15:07 [Qemu-devel] inconsistency between device traversal in qdev and legacy Peter Maydell
2011-06-08 17:00 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-06-08 17:37 ` Andreas Färber
2011-06-08 17:39 ` Peter Maydell
2011-06-08 18:19 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2011-06-08 19:06 ` Andreas Färber
2011-06-09 13:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-09 14:12 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-06-09 14:32 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DEFBD34.1050507@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=andreas.faerber@web.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.