All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, Thomas Graf <tgraf@redhat.com>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3rd revision] Add SELinux context support to AUDIT target
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:45:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DEFC338.3070908@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201106081436.38509.sgrubb@redhat.com>


> how is this error preserved in the audit trail?
>   
Look at my patch again - if the secctx cannot be retrieved, either 
because a) it does not exists; or b) because of internal error or 
otherwise, then it is not logged in the audit log as part of the 
NETFILTER_PKT message (the fact there is internal LSM error has 
absolutely nothing to do with a netfilter packet!).

If, internally (upon calling security_secid_to_secctx) there is a 
decision to handle that *internal* error in one way or another so be it, 
but as far as my patch goes - there is no secctx if that function 
returns nothing and I think that is the right think to do.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-08 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20  1:09 [PATCH] Add SELinux context support to AUDIT target Mr Dash Four
2011-05-26 16:49 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-05-26 17:03   ` Mr Dash Four
2011-05-26 17:44     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-06-04 15:12     ` [PATCH 2nd revision] " Mr Dash Four
2011-06-05 23:06       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-06-06 12:02         ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-06 23:20           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-06-07  8:18             ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-07  9:12               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-06-07 10:32                 ` [PATCH 3rd " Mr Dash Four
2011-06-08 14:49                   ` Steve Grubb
2011-06-08 16:12                     ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-08 17:14                       ` Steve Grubb
2011-06-08 18:04                         ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-08 18:13                     ` Casey Schaufler
2011-06-08 18:33                       ` Eric Paris
2011-06-08 19:00                         ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-08 19:08                           ` Eric Paris
2011-06-08 19:14                             ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-08 19:28                             ` Steve Grubb
2011-06-08 19:39                               ` Eric Paris
2011-06-09 12:28                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-06-09 12:52                                   ` Eric Paris
2011-06-09 12:56                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2011-06-09 14:08                                     ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-09 15:06                                       ` Eric Paris
2011-06-09 15:16                                         ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-16  8:36                                           ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-18 12:08                                             ` [PATCH 4th " Mr Dash Four
2011-06-20 12:20                                               ` Steve Grubb
2011-06-20 14:21                                                 ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-20 14:27                                                   ` Eric Paris
2011-06-30 11:35                                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2011-06-08 18:36                       ` [PATCH 3rd " Steve Grubb
2011-06-08 18:45                         ` Mr Dash Four [this message]
2011-06-06 12:14       ` [PATCH 2nd " Steve Grubb
2011-06-06 12:25         ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-06 12:30           ` Steve Grubb
2011-06-06 12:42             ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-06 12:53               ` Steve Grubb
2011-06-06 13:10                 ` Mr Dash Four
2011-06-06 23:22                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-06-07  0:59                     ` Steve Grubb
2011-06-07  1:23                       ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DEFC338.3070908@googlemail.com \
    --to=mr.dash.four@googlemail.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=tgraf@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.