From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Li, Xin" <xin.li@intel.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Yang, Wei Y" <wei.y.yang@intel.com>,
"Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Adjust shadow paging to work when SMEP=1 and CR0.WP=0
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:43:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF06B7D.9040804@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FC2FB65B4D919844ADE4BE3C2BB739AD5AC56670@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 06/09/2011 05:43 AM, Li, Xin wrote:
> Do we have test cases with guest.wp=0 in KVM test suite?
Yes, see x86/access.c, AC_CPU_CR0_WP.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-09 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-06 13:19 [PATCH] KVM: Adjust shadow paging to work when SMEP=1 and CR0.WP=0 Avi Kivity
2011-06-09 2:43 ` Li, Xin
2011-06-09 6:43 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF06B7D.9040804@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=haitao.shan@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.y.yang@intel.com \
--cc=xin.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.