From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikolay Kichukov Subject: Re: from 2x RAID1 to 1x RAID6 ? Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:18:22 +0300 Message-ID: <4DF0C81E.4020903@oldum.net> References: <4DEE6A11.1030205@xunil.at> <4DEE84F0.2030205@harddata.com> <4DEEBB66.7080802@nybeta.com> <4DEF4AC5.1090003@anonymous.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Brown Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/08/2011 01:33 PM, David Brown wrote: > So you install your RAID10 (or RAID6, if you prefer) system, and make sure you keep backups. And if you /do/ get hit by > a double disk failure in the wrong place, you spend the day restoring everything from the backups. When management > complain that a 24 hour downtime doesn't fit with their 99.99% uptime expectations, you remind them that this is > amortized over the next 27 years... Hi David, nice one ;-) Did you actually calculate 24 hours for those 99.99% within 27 years? ;-) Cheers, - -Nik -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN8MgdAAoJEDFLYVOGGjgXIiYH/0qMOkHCKTV5WeBhlPdGOpjr RzniFUYxpVYLvHAna7DWmrUaYqGMgZWadljt2GZB90NLqhDQX0OgIKm5thGRwaLD 09x2h2zpT4XV8a78VRU63blS2jHBygCxqVkUnagCHlYVZ63Jm4qZZH0jeHJkWzPV YjQXhGILzx8H02P1G8WDCnzg32+k8XNleatV2+441OUidnYV1019SyYDX6/5/UDh 88VMIiWOMA0RvJP4b9yGw9vV/pEx2LReAahfhRAZ3iu9sOc5kUtCjiHzghE8n2nW oF9t4i5raS4q54tz2WGs/iDiV20gO8lsNtIjReIAAEnMFlpIZapelVyxj9HjNe0= =Y5nu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----