From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM:SAMSUNG: Move S3C DMA driver to drivers/dma Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:24:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4DF10FC1.9030406@samsung.com> References: <1307432901-22781-1-git-send-email-alim.akhtar@samsung.com> <20110607081527.GB20929@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110607182923.GA28451@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110607223614.GC28451@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:42038 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751942Ab1FIS0Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:26:16 -0400 Received: by gxk21 with SMTP id 21so944347gxk.19 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:26:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110607223614.GC28451@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Jassi Brar , Kyungmin Park , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, root On 06/07/11 15:36, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > I see no effort from the Samsung folk to even start considering moving > to common APIs - I see precisely the opposite. They seem to have a > strong desire to invent their own new APIs all the time rather than > look at existing APIs and discuss how they can be used or adapted so > they work for Samsung. > > That is not sustainable, and if it continues, it will probably result > in Samsung stuff being chucked out of mainline. We are most definitely > at the point where custom APIs are no longer permissible, especially > for any new SoCs. Hi Russell and everyone, Sorry for late participation on this :( I'm out of my office for biz. trip so it was hard to check my e-mail and will be back to my country this weekend. Anyway, I and my colleagues know what we have to do for Linux world. And as I know, we are preparing some stuff for it so please don't expect the worst :) I should be back on this after discussing with my colleagues. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:24:01 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM:SAMSUNG: Move S3C DMA driver to drivers/dma In-Reply-To: <20110607223614.GC28451@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1307432901-22781-1-git-send-email-alim.akhtar@samsung.com> <20110607081527.GB20929@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110607182923.GA28451@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110607223614.GC28451@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <4DF10FC1.9030406@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/07/11 15:36, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > I see no effort from the Samsung folk to even start considering moving > to common APIs - I see precisely the opposite. They seem to have a > strong desire to invent their own new APIs all the time rather than > look at existing APIs and discuss how they can be used or adapted so > they work for Samsung. > > That is not sustainable, and if it continues, it will probably result > in Samsung stuff being chucked out of mainline. We are most definitely > at the point where custom APIs are no longer permissible, especially > for any new SoCs. Hi Russell and everyone, Sorry for late participation on this :( I'm out of my office for biz. trip so it was hard to check my e-mail and will be back to my country this weekend. Anyway, I and my colleagues know what we have to do for Linux world. And as I know, we are preparing some stuff for it so please don't expect the worst :) I should be back on this after discussing with my colleagues. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.