From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nfs-utils: Support binding to source address.
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:16:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF13842.1020307@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DF102E0.5000201@candelatech.com>
On 06/09/2011 01:29 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 10:18 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> On 06/08/2011 07:01 PM, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
>>> From: Ben Greear<greearb@candelatech.com>
>>>
>>> This lets one specify the source IP address for
>>> sockets, allowing users to leverage routing rules
>>> on multi-homed systems.
>> Right out of the box I do think some support like
>> this would be good... but I not convinced on how needed
>> something like this is which means there is a lot of
>> change here for basically not... But lets continue
>> to talk about to see where we end up....
>>
>> One thing you must do is break up this patch in to
>> a more readable patch series. There is no way I going
>> to commit a patch that is close to 1500 lines
>> that so invasive.
>
> The vast majority of the patch is adding an extra
> argument to various methods to get things to compile.
Yeah I know... I saw that... But there has to be
some logical way to break this up..
>
> Do you want me to break those changes into individual
> chunks, or should I just separate the parsing & documentation
> chunks out?
I guess that would be start.... but just breaking this up
unto just a couple patches probably will not do anything for
readability either...
>
> I can dummy stuff out with passing NULL around to make
> lots of smaller patches, but I'm not sure it helps
> any readability.
I don't know either... but it make me very nervous
to apply a 1400+ line patch especially when its basically
rewriting mount... I've broken mount before... Its not
a pretty sight... ;-)
steved.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-09 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-08 23:01 [PATCH v2] nfs-utils: Support binding to source address greearb
2011-06-09 14:05 ` Chuck Lever
2011-06-09 15:50 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-09 18:39 ` Chuck Lever
2011-06-09 23:47 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-09 17:18 ` Steve Dickson
2011-06-09 17:29 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-09 21:16 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2011-06-09 21:25 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-09 23:48 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF13842.1020307@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.