From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: Added advisement against marvell ATA controller in the ATA wiki page Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:19:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4DF20BDC.5090109@pobox.com> References: <20110610070030.GB15235@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:65466 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756332Ab1FJM3S (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:29:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110610070030.GB15235@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , Saeed Bishara , Hubert Bailey On 11-06-10 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: .. > If anyone has _any_ better idea, please share. As it currently > stands, marvell controllers are the only problematic ones in ATA land > and it would be AWESOME to see it somehow resolved. .. It's only the Marvell AHCI controllers that are causing grief. The ones supported by sata_mv are among the very best performing SATA controllers that work with Linux. So long as it clarifies that point, then great. -- Mark Lord Real-Time Remedies Inc. mlord@pobox.com