From: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Jim Bos <jim876@xs4all.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39.1 immediately reboots/resets on EFI system
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:45:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF29E7E.50908@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110610175429.GA28500@srcf.ucam.org>
Op 10-06-11 19:54, Matthew Garrett schreef:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:51:46PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Well,
>>
>> Op 10-06-11 18:47, Matthew Garrett schreef:
>>> So this is obviously even more of a hack, but before you check whether
>>> the memblock has already been reserved could you __check_region it as
>>> well? That ought to avoid us touching the kernel. I've got a patch for
>>> grub that'll avoid the situation where we load the kernel on top of an
>>> existing resource and I'll port that to grub2, but that's still going to
>>> be awkward for existing bootloaders.
>>>
>> Erm, __check_region calls __requestion_region which does a kzalloc,
>> if I call __check_region it doesn't boot, probably because of that.
> Oh, bother.
>
>> Do you want me to manually run through iomem_resource? Is it even available up at that point?
> Should be - we've already called insert_resource to set up the kernel at
> this point.
>
Version with yinghai's free_bootmem_late_with_active_regions.
Still has an issue though, I'm getting 2 warnings from swapper:
[ 2.867034] BUG: Bad page state in process swapper pfn:01900
[ 2.867303] page:ffffea0000057800 count:0 mapcount:-127 mapping: (null) index:0x0
[ 2.867683] page flags: 0x100000000000000()
[ 2.867887] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.39.1-patser+ #15
[ 2.867888] Call Trace:
[ 2.867893] [<ffffffff810f349b>] ? dump_page+0x9b/0xd0
[ 2.867894] [<ffffffff810f3599>] bad_page+0xc9/0x120
[ 2.867896] [<ffffffff810f36af>] free_pages_prepare+0xbf/0x110
[ 2.867898] [<ffffffff810f4fa9>] free_hot_cold_page+0x49/0x440
[ 2.867899] [<ffffffff810f59fd>] __free_pages+0x2d/0x40
[ 2.867900] [<ffffffff810f5a53>] free_pages+0x43/0x50
[ 2.867903] [<ffffffff81029542>] free_init_pages+0x132/0x1c0
[ 2.867904] [<ffffffff81029cd3>] mark_rodata_ro+0x143/0x150
[ 2.867906] [<ffffffff810001d8>] init_post+0x18/0xd0
[ 2.867909] [<ffffffff81ab7d45>] kernel_init+0x158/0x163
[ 2.867911] [<ffffffff815688d4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 2.867913] [<ffffffff81ab7bed>] ? start_kernel+0x3dc/0x3dc
[ 2.867914] [<ffffffff815688d0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
[ 2.867915] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
[ 2.867922] BUG: Bad page state in process swapper pfn:01910
[ 2.868187] page:ffffea0000057b80 count:0 mapcount:-127 mapping: (null) index:0x0
[ 2.868567] page flags: 0x100000000000000()
[ 2.868769] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Tainted: G B 2.6.39.1-patser+ #15
[ 2.868770] Call Trace:
[ 2.868771] [<ffffffff810f349b>] ? dump_page+0x9b/0xd0
[ 2.868773] [<ffffffff810f3599>] bad_page+0xc9/0x120
[ 2.868774] [<ffffffff810f36af>] free_pages_prepare+0xbf/0x110
[ 2.868775] [<ffffffff810f4fa9>] free_hot_cold_page+0x49/0x440
[ 2.868777] [<ffffffff810f59fd>] __free_pages+0x2d/0x40
[ 2.868778] [<ffffffff810f5a53>] free_pages+0x43/0x50
[ 2.868779] [<ffffffff81029542>] free_init_pages+0x132/0x1c0
[ 2.868781] [<ffffffff81029cd3>] mark_rodata_ro+0x143/0x150
[ 2.868782] [<ffffffff810001d8>] init_post+0x18/0xd0
[ 2.868784] [<ffffffff81ab7d45>] kernel_init+0x158/0x163
[ 2.868785] [<ffffffff815688d4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 2.868787] [<ffffffff81ab7bed>] ? start_kernel+0x3dc/0x3dc
[ 2.868788] [<ffffffff815688d0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
Also don't rate for style, that wasn't the scope of this patch. This is just to have something to test with ;)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 19ae14b..0cd3800 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
#define ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
-void memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end);
void memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name);
void memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end);
@@ -19,5 +18,6 @@ u64 memblock_x86_hole_size(u64 start, u64 end);
u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(int nid, u64 start, u64 end, u64 size, u64 align);
u64 memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
u64 memblock_x86_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
+bool memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
index aa11693..992da5e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
#include <linux/range.h>
/* Check for already reserved areas */
-static bool __init check_with_memblock_reserved_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align)
+bool __init memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align)
{
struct memblock_region *r;
u64 addr = *addrp, last;
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ u64 __init memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align)
if (addr >= ei_last)
continue;
*sizep = ei_last - addr;
- while (check_with_memblock_reserved_size(&addr, sizep, align))
+ while (memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(&addr, sizep, align))
;
if (*sizep)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
index 02b48dc..46e63ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -315,20 +315,85 @@ static void __init print_efi_memmap(void)
}
#endif /* EFI_DEBUG */
+static struct resource * __available_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new)
+{
+ resource_size_t start = new->start;
+ resource_size_t end = new->end;
+ struct resource *tmp, **p;
+
+ if (end < start)
+ return root;
+ if (start < root->start)
+ return root;
+ if (end > root->end)
+ return root;
+ p = &root->child;
+ for (;;) {
+ tmp = *p;
+ if (!tmp || tmp->start > end)
+ return NULL;
+ p = &tmp->sibling;
+ if (tmp->end < start)
+ continue;
+ return tmp;
+ }
+}
+
+static int is_used_region(struct resource *parent, struct resource *new)
+{
+ struct resource *first, *next;
+
+ for (;; parent = first) {
+ first = __available_resource(parent, new);
+ if (!first)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (first == parent)
+ return 1;
+ if (WARN_ON(first == new)) /* duplicated insertion */
+ return 1;
+
+ if ((first->start > new->start) || (first->end < new->end))
+ break;
+ if ((first->start == new->start) && (first->end == new->end))
+ break;
+ }
+
+ for (next = first; ; next = next->sibling) {
+ if (next->start < new->start || next->end > new->end)
+ return 1;
+ if (!next->sibling)
+ break;
+ if (next->sibling->start > new->end)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
void __init efi_reserve_boot_services(void)
{
void *p;
for (p = memmap.map; p < memmap.map_end; p += memmap.desc_size) {
efi_memory_desc_t *md = p;
- unsigned long long start = md->phys_addr;
- unsigned long long size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
+ u64 start = md->phys_addr;
+ u64 size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
+ struct resource dummy = { .start = start, .end = start + size };
if (md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE &&
md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA)
continue;
-
- memblock_x86_reserve_range(start, start + size, "EFI Boot");
+ if (is_used_region(&iomem_resource, &dummy) ||
+ memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(&start, &size,
+ 1<<EFI_PAGE_SHIFT)) {
+ /* Could not reserve, skip it */
+ md->num_pages = 0;
+ printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Could not reserve boot area "
+ "[0x%llx-0x%llx)\n", start, start+size);
+ } else
+ memblock_x86_reserve_range(start, start+size, "EFI Boot");
}
}
@@ -345,7 +410,11 @@ static void __init efi_free_boot_services(void)
md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA)
continue;
- free_bootmem_late(start, size);
+ /* Could not reserve boot area */
+ if (!size)
+ continue;
+
+ free_bootmem_late_with_active_regions(start, size);
}
}
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 6507dde..713287f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1352,6 +1352,8 @@ extern void get_pfn_range_for_nid(unsigned int nid,
extern unsigned long find_min_pfn_with_active_regions(void);
extern void free_bootmem_with_active_regions(int nid,
unsigned long max_low_pfn);
+void free_bootmem_late_with_active_regions(unsigned long addr,
+ unsigned long size);
int add_from_early_node_map(struct range *range, int az,
int nr_range, int nid);
u64 __init find_memory_core_early(int nid, u64 size, u64 align,
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index e78b324..4c3bcd7a 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3790,6 +3790,38 @@ void __init free_bootmem_with_active_regions(int nid,
}
}
+/**
+ * free_bootmem_late_with_active_regions - Call free_bootmem_late for each active range
+ * @addr: starting address of the range
+ * @size: size of the range in bytes
+ *
+ * this function make sure on active regions only
+ */
+void __init free_bootmem_late_with_active_regions(unsigned long addr,
+ unsigned long size)
+{
+ int i;
+ int nid = MAX_NUMNODES;
+ unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_UP(addr);
+ unsigned long end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(addr + size);
+
+ if (start_pfn >= end_pfn)
+ return;
+
+ for_each_active_range_index_in_nid(i, nid) {
+ unsigned long common_start, common_end;
+
+ common_start = max(start_pfn, early_node_map[i].start_pfn);
+ common_end = min(end_pfn, early_node_map[i].end_pfn);
+
+ if (common_start >= common_end)
+ continue;
+
+ free_bootmem_late(common_start << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ (common_end - common_start) << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ }
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
/*
* Basic iterator support. Return the last range of PFNs for a node
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-10 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-06 11:15 gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Jim
2010-11-07 21:31 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-07 22:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-11-07 23:03 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-08 10:49 ` Richard Guenther
2010-11-08 11:20 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-08 11:20 ` Richard Guenther
2010-11-08 11:47 ` Paul Koning
2010-11-08 11:53 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-11-08 12:20 ` Michael Matz
2010-11-08 18:39 ` Dave Korn
2010-11-09 13:00 ` Michael Matz
2010-11-09 13:48 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-09 13:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-11-09 16:43 ` Jim
2010-11-13 11:13 ` [PATCH] i8k: Tell gcc that *regs gets clobbered Jim Bos
2010-11-15 0:52 ` gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? James Cloos
2010-11-15 3:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-15 8:56 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-11-15 9:12 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-15 9:20 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-11-15 10:03 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-11-15 10:54 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-15 11:16 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-11-15 11:37 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-15 17:36 ` Jim Bos
2010-11-15 17:44 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-11-15 18:17 ` Jim Bos
2010-11-15 18:26 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-11-15 19:10 ` Jim Bos
2010-11-15 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-15 17:40 ` Jim Bos
2010-11-15 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-15 18:30 ` Jim Bos
2010-11-15 18:37 ` Jim Bos
2010-11-15 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-15 18:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-11-15 19:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-11-15 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-15 19:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-11-15 20:22 ` Jim Bos
2011-06-03 13:05 ` 2.6.39.1 immediately reboots/resets on EFI system Jim Bos
2011-06-03 13:33 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-03 14:26 ` Jim Bos
2011-06-03 14:46 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-05 10:40 ` Jim Bos
2011-06-05 12:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-06 15:01 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-06 15:40 ` Jim Bos
2011-06-06 15:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-06 15:27 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-06 16:11 ` Jim Bos
2011-06-06 16:43 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-07 0:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-07 1:41 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-07 2:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-07 8:25 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-07 15:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-07 9:08 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-07 12:22 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-07 22:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-08 16:44 ` Jim Bos
2011-06-08 19:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-08 19:23 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 19:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-08 19:29 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 19:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-08 19:38 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 19:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-08 19:52 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 19:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-08 19:52 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 20:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-08 20:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 20:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-08 20:30 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 20:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-08 20:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 20:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-08 21:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 21:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-08 21:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 21:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-08 21:36 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 21:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-08 21:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-08 21:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-08 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-08 23:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-08 21:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-10 16:47 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-10 17:51 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-10 17:54 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-10 22:45 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2011-06-10 22:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-10 23:03 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-10 23:17 ` Greg KH
2011-06-10 23:22 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-10 23:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-10 23:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-10 23:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-10 23:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-11 0:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-11 0:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-14 18:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-11 15:29 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-10 23:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-06-13 16:47 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-13 17:52 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-13 18:00 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-13 18:14 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-13 18:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-13 18:23 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-13 18:33 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-13 18:45 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-14 14:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-14 14:50 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-14 14:55 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-11-15 22:43 ` gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ? Andi Kleen
2010-11-15 22:46 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-11-15 19:53 ` Richard Henderson
2010-11-15 10:24 ` Richard Guenther
2010-11-15 18:45 ` Jeff Law
2010-11-15 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-15 22:07 ` Richard Guenther
2010-11-15 22:58 ` Jeff Law
2010-11-15 23:07 ` Richard Guenther
2010-11-16 4:10 ` Jeff Law
2010-11-15 18:42 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF29E7E.50908@gmail.com \
--to=m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jim876@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.