All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@gmail.com>
To: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Triple-parity raid6
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:14:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF3A27E.8080806@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <it058n$1ju$1@dough.gmane.org>

A quick note of caution (and someone from Netapp, feel free to speak up).

Netapp has a patent on triple parity raid (c.f. 
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7640484.html).  A quick look over this, 
suggests that the major innovation is the layout and computation which 
they simplified in a particular manner.  That is, I don't think their 
patent covers triple parity RAID in general, but does cover their 
implementation, and the diagonal parity with anti-diagonal parity 
(effectively counter propagating or orthogonalized parity).

I am not sure what this means from a coding sense, other than not to use 
their techniques without a license to do so.  If Netapp wants to grant 
such a license, this would be good, but I suspect that it wouldn't be 
quite as simple as this.

Just a note so that we don't encounter problems.  I think its very 
possible to avoid their IP, as it would somewhat hard to claim ownership 
of the Galois Field math behind RAID calculations.  They can (and do) 
claim a particular implementation and algorithm.

[also not trying to open the patent on code wars here, just pointing out 
the current situation ]


-- 
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics, Inc.
email: landman@scalableinformatics.com
web  : http://scalableinformatics.com
        http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster
phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
fax  : +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-11 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-09  0:01 Triple-parity raid6 David Brown
2011-06-09  1:49 ` NeilBrown
2011-06-09 11:32   ` David Brown
2011-06-09 12:04     ` NeilBrown
2011-06-09 19:19       ` David Brown
2011-06-10  3:22       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-06-10  8:45         ` David Brown
2011-06-10 12:20           ` Christoph Dittmann
2011-06-10 14:28             ` David Brown
2011-06-11 10:13               ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-06-11 11:51                 ` David Brown
2011-06-11 13:18                   ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-06-11 14:53                     ` David Brown
2011-06-11 15:05                       ` Joe Landman
2011-06-11 16:31                         ` David Brown
2011-06-11 16:57                           ` Joe Landman
2011-06-12  9:05                             ` David Brown
2011-06-11 17:14                           ` Joe Landman [this message]
2011-06-11 18:05                             ` David Brown
2011-06-10  9:03       ` David Brown
2011-06-10 13:56       ` Bill Davidsen
2011-06-09 22:42 ` David Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DF3A27E.8080806@gmail.com \
    --to=joe.landman@gmail.com \
    --cc=david.brown@hesbynett.no \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.