From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@gmail.com>
To: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Triple-parity raid6
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:14:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF3A27E.8080806@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <it058n$1ju$1@dough.gmane.org>
A quick note of caution (and someone from Netapp, feel free to speak up).
Netapp has a patent on triple parity raid (c.f.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7640484.html). A quick look over this,
suggests that the major innovation is the layout and computation which
they simplified in a particular manner. That is, I don't think their
patent covers triple parity RAID in general, but does cover their
implementation, and the diagonal parity with anti-diagonal parity
(effectively counter propagating or orthogonalized parity).
I am not sure what this means from a coding sense, other than not to use
their techniques without a license to do so. If Netapp wants to grant
such a license, this would be good, but I suspect that it wouldn't be
quite as simple as this.
Just a note so that we don't encounter problems. I think its very
possible to avoid their IP, as it would somewhat hard to claim ownership
of the Galois Field math behind RAID calculations. They can (and do)
claim a particular implementation and algorithm.
[also not trying to open the patent on code wars here, just pointing out
the current situation ]
--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics, Inc.
email: landman@scalableinformatics.com
web : http://scalableinformatics.com
http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster
phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
fax : +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-11 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-09 0:01 Triple-parity raid6 David Brown
2011-06-09 1:49 ` NeilBrown
2011-06-09 11:32 ` David Brown
2011-06-09 12:04 ` NeilBrown
2011-06-09 19:19 ` David Brown
2011-06-10 3:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-06-10 8:45 ` David Brown
2011-06-10 12:20 ` Christoph Dittmann
2011-06-10 14:28 ` David Brown
2011-06-11 10:13 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-06-11 11:51 ` David Brown
2011-06-11 13:18 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-06-11 14:53 ` David Brown
2011-06-11 15:05 ` Joe Landman
2011-06-11 16:31 ` David Brown
2011-06-11 16:57 ` Joe Landman
2011-06-12 9:05 ` David Brown
2011-06-11 17:14 ` Joe Landman [this message]
2011-06-11 18:05 ` David Brown
2011-06-10 9:03 ` David Brown
2011-06-10 13:56 ` Bill Davidsen
2011-06-09 22:42 ` David Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF3A27E.8080806@gmail.com \
--to=joe.landman@gmail.com \
--cc=david.brown@hesbynett.no \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.