From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6604C80052 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:09:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2011 13:09:02 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,360,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="14027329" Received: from doubt.jf.intel.com (HELO [10.7.199.61]) ([10.7.199.61]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2011 13:09:02 -0700 Message-ID: <4DF66E5D.3080000@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:09:01 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Zanussi References: <4DF657B6.4030609@linux.intel.com> <1307990989.10825.14.camel@elmorro> In-Reply-To: <1307990989.10825.14.camel@elmorro> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] meta-intel: add bbappends for systemtap X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:09:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/13/2011 11:49 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 11:32 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> On 06/13/2011 07:32 AM, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote: >>> From: Tom Zanussi >>> >>> Removing any old references to systemtap from meta means we need to add >>> it here. It also adds systemtap support for the other, previously >>> uncovered meta-intel bsps. >> >> Wouldn't it make more sense to add systemtap to and image recipe, either >> a new recipe or a bbappend? Also, it seems to me that RRECOMMENDS would >> make more sense than RDEPENDS - as it isn't required for boot. >> > > Hmm, not following you here - why would I want a new image recipe for > systemtap? > > Systemtap fits in with the other profiling tools in the > task-core-tools-profile as far as I can see;\ Ah, I see. OK. > this patch essentially adds > systemtap to that list, but since it won't run on half the architectures > we support, it can't be simply added to the recipe but needs to be > appended for each machine (well, that may change when I switch to > COMPATIBLE_HOST as pointed out by a couple people, but that was the > reason behind the current appends). > And, yeah, maybe RRECOMMENDs makes more sense here, will think about > changing that on the respin. OK. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel