From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:31:27 -0700 Message-ID: <4DF8359F.10809@zytor.com> References: <20110614190850.GA13526@linux-mips.org> <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301E7281306@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301E7281306@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: "Luck, Tony" Cc: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" , "linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Chen Liqin , Paul Mackerras , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , Guan Xuetao , Lennox Wu , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Jesper Nilsson , Russell King , Yoshinori Sato , Helge Deller , "x86@kernel.org" , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Ingo Molnar , Geert Uytterhoeven , Matt Turner On 06/14/2011 03:08 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: > diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > index 38280ef..849805a 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ config IA64 > select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK > select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG > select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS > + select HAVE_PC_PARPORT > select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE > select GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ if SMP > select IRQ_PER_CPU > > I took a look at the back of all my ia64 systems - none of them > have a parallel port. It seems unlikely that new systems will > start adding parallel ports :-) > > So even if I had a printer (or other device) that used a parallel > port, I have no way to test it. > If it has PCI slots, it can have a parallel port. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:32:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:54453 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1491043Ab1FOEb5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:31:57 +0200 Received: from tazenda.hos.anvin.org ([IPv6:2001:470:861f:0:e269:95ff:fe35:9f3c]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zytor.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5F4VWO0019301 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:31:32 -0700 Message-ID: <4DF8359F.10809@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:31:27 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luck, Tony" CC: Ralf Baechle , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Chen Liqin , Chris Metcalf , Chris Zankel , "David S. Miller" , "Yu, Fenghua" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Guan Xuetao , Helge Deller , Ingo Molnar , Ivan Kokshaysky , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Jesper Nilsson , Kyle McMartin , Lennox Wu , Matt Turner , Michal Simek , Mikael Starvik , Paul Mackerras , Paul Mundt , Richard Henderson , Russell King , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , "x86@kernel.org" , Yoshinori Sato , "microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au" , "linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-cris-kernel@axis.com" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" , "linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig References: <20110614190850.GA13526@linux-mips.org> <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301E7281306@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301E7281306@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 30393 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: hpa@zytor.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: X-Keywords: X-UID: 12088 On 06/14/2011 03:08 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: > diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > index 38280ef..849805a 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ config IA64 > select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK > select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG > select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS > + select HAVE_PC_PARPORT > select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE > select GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ if SMP > select IRQ_PER_CPU > > I took a look at the back of all my ia64 systems - none of them > have a parallel port. It seems unlikely that new systems will > start adding parallel ports :-) > > So even if I had a printer (or other device) that used a parallel > port, I have no way to test it. > If it has PCI slots, it can have a parallel port. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:31:27 -0700 Message-ID: <4DF8359F.10809@zytor.com> References: <20110614190850.GA13526@linux-mips.org> <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301E7281306@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" , "linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Chen Liqin , Paul Mackerras , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , Guan Xuetao , Lennox Wu , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Jesper Nilsson , Russell King , Yoshinori Sato , Helge Deller , "x86@kernel.org" , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Ingo Molnar , Geert Uytterhoeven , Matt Turner Return-path: In-Reply-To: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301E7281306@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org On 06/14/2011 03:08 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: > diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > index 38280ef..849805a 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ config IA64 > select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK > select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG > select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS > + select HAVE_PC_PARPORT > select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE > select GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ if SMP > select IRQ_PER_CPU > > I took a look at the back of all my ia64 systems - none of them > have a parallel port. It seems unlikely that new systems will > start adding parallel ports :-) > > So even if I had a printer (or other device) that used a parallel > port, I have no way to test it. > If it has PCI slots, it can have a parallel port. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.zytor.com (terminus.zytor.com [IPv6:2001:1868:205::10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F27EB6F62 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:32:04 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4DF8359F.10809@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:31:27 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luck, Tony" Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig References: <20110614190850.GA13526@linux-mips.org> <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301E7281306@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301E7281306@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" , "linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , Chen Liqin , Paul Mackerras , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , Guan Xuetao , Lennox Wu , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Jesper Nilsson , Russell King , Yoshinori Sato , Helge Deller , "x86@kernel.org" , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Ingo Molnar , Geert Uytterhoeven , Matt Turner , "Yu, Fenghua" , "microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au" , Chris Metcalf , Mikael Starvik , Ivan Kokshaysky , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Richard Henderson , Chris Zankel , Michal Simek , "linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-cris-kernel@axis.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ralf Baechle , Kyle McMartin , Paul Mundt , "linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "David S. Miller" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 06/14/2011 03:08 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: > diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > index 38280ef..849805a 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ config IA64 > select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK > select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG > select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS > + select HAVE_PC_PARPORT > select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE > select GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ if SMP > select IRQ_PER_CPU > > I took a look at the back of all my ia64 systems - none of them > have a parallel port. It seems unlikely that new systems will > start adding parallel ports :-) > > So even if I had a printer (or other device) that used a parallel > port, I have no way to test it. > If it has PCI slots, it can have a parallel port. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:31:27 -0700 Subject: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig In-Reply-To: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301E7281306@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20110614190850.GA13526@linux-mips.org> <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301E7281306@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: <4DF8359F.10809@zytor.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/14/2011 03:08 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: > diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > index 38280ef..849805a 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ config IA64 > select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK > select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG > select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS > + select HAVE_PC_PARPORT > select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE > select GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ if SMP > select IRQ_PER_CPU > > I took a look at the back of all my ia64 systems - none of them > have a parallel port. It seems unlikely that new systems will > start adding parallel ports :-) > > So even if I had a printer (or other device) that used a parallel > port, I have no way to test it. > If it has PCI slots, it can have a parallel port. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.