From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Sean Noonan <Sean.Noonan@twosigma.com>
Cc: "'linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com'" <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
Martin Bligh <Martin.Bligh@twosigma.com>,
Stephen Degler <Stephen.Degler@twosigma.com>,
Ian Baum <Ian.Baum@twosigma.com>,
Trammell Hudson <Trammell.Hudson@twosigma.com>
Subject: Re: sparse file handling bug in XFS
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:08:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFA2A76.6000104@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <081DDE43F61F3D43929A181B477DCA95639B561F@MSXAOA6.twosigma.com>
On 6/16/11 9:49 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
> Sparse files do not stay sparse.
> Here's the simplest test case I've got so far. I don't think it can get much simpler than this.
>
> This did not exist in 2.6.36. It appeared by 2.6.38-rc8. It continued into 2.6.38.2. It continues to exist on 3.0.0-rc3.
>
> # for x in gogo xfs; do date | dd of=sparse-file bs=1k seek=4096; stat sparse-file; done
Funky; if we do xfs_bmap, it shows the right nr of blocks allocated:
# for x in gogo xfs; do date | dd of=sparse-file bs=1k seek=4096; stat sparse-file | grep Blocks; xfs_bmap -v sparse-file; done
Size: 4194333 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file
sparse-file:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE AG AG-OFFSET TOTAL
0: [0..8191]: hole 8192
1: [8192..8199]: 450475168..450475175 2 (18736320..18736327) 8
Size: 4194333 Blocks: 8192 IO Block: 4096 regular file
sparse-file:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE AG AG-OFFSET TOTAL
0: [0..8191]: hole 8192
1: [8192..8199]: 459367952..459367959 2 (27629104..27629111) 8
And if we unmount & remount it's right again:
# stat sparse-file | grep Blocks
Size: 4194333 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file
so they do remain sparse, but stat tells us the wrong thing. I think it has
to do with the count of delayed blocks but I'll try to look into it.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-16 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-16 14:49 sparse file handling bug in XFS Sean Noonan
2011-06-16 16:08 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2011-06-16 17:33 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-06-16 17:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-16 21:08 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-06-19 22:27 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DFA2A76.6000104@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=Ian.Baum@twosigma.com \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@twosigma.com \
--cc=Sean.Noonan@twosigma.com \
--cc=Stephen.Degler@twosigma.com \
--cc=Trammell.Hudson@twosigma.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.