From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: sekharan@us.ibm.com
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, XFS Mailing List <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: [xfstests] Make the requirement of projid32bit explicit in test 244
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:53:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFB5C71.2060506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308271608.5505.7.camel@chandra-lucid.beaverton.ibm.com>
On 6/16/11 7:46 PM, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 19:27 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 6/14/11 8:10 PM, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
>>> Test 244 depends on projid32bit feature in mkfs.xfs. Not all versions
>>> of xfsprogs provide that feature in mkfs.xfs.
>>>
>>> This patch makes it an explicit requirement and avoids running the test
>>> if the feature doesn't exist, instead of failing the test with an obscure
>>> message.
>>>
>>> Signed-Off-By: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
>>
>> This is fine; I'd prefer to check it in with just _require_projid32bit
>> and drop the _in_xfs if that's ok with you, it's an xfs-only test
>> anyway so it's just a bit wordy :)
>
> Fine by me. You want me to reroll the patch ?
I'll just fix it with a note on the way in since you agree, thanks.
-Eric
> chandra
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Eric
>>
>>> ---
>>> diff --git a/244 b/244
>>> index 99762a5..e9f8a3d 100755
>>> --- a/244
>>> +++ b/244
>>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ _cleanup()
>>> _supported_fs xfs
>>> _require_xfs_quota
>>> _require_scratch
>>> +_require_projid32bit_in_xfs
>>>
>>> export MOUNT_OPTIONS="-opquota"
>>>
>>> diff --git a/common.rc b/common.rc
>>> index c510c66..4e051dc 100644
>>> --- a/common.rc
>>> +++ b/common.rc
>>> @@ -797,6 +797,15 @@ _require_command()
>>> [ -n "$1" -a -x "$1" ] || _notrun "$_cmd utility required, skipped this test"
>>> }
>>>
>>> +# this test requires the projid32bit feature to be available in
>>> +# mkfs.xfs
>>> +#
>>> +_require_projid32bit_in_xfs()
>>> +{
>>> + _scratch_mkfs_xfs -f -i projid32bit=0 2>&1 >/dev/null \
>>> + || _notrun "mkfs.xfs doesn't have projid32bit feature"
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> # this test requires that external log/realtime devices are not in use
>>> #
>>> _require_nonexternal()
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> xfs mailing list
>>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-15 1:10 [PATCH]: [xfstests] Make the requirement of projid32bit explicit in test 244 Chandra Seetharaman
2011-06-17 0:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-06-17 0:46 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2011-06-17 13:53 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DFB5C71.2060506@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.