From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QYeUy-0000fY-IF for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:26:41 +0200 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5KDN5qR027891 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Macintosh-5.local (172.25.36.229) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:23:05 -0700 Message-ID: <4DFF49B8.9050908@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:23:04 -0500 From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Architecture mismatch QA check not fatal? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:26:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/20/11 2:41 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > I was building qt this weekend and I noticed this one: > > WARNING: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (40 to 62) on /work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/qt4-embedded-4.7.3-r26.1/packages-split/qt4-embedded-tools/usr/bin/moc > WARNING: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (40 to 62) on /work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/qt4-embedded-4.7.3-r26.1/packages-split/qt4-embedded-tools/usr/bin/uic > WARNING: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (40 to 62) on /work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/qt4-embedded-4.7.3-r26.1/packages-split/qt4-embedded-tools/usr/bin/rcc > > Shouldn't that be a fatal error, shipping x86 binaries in arm packages? There are a couple of very minor use cases where this may be necessary. So I'm wondering if we can put in an override mechanism that tells the system to make the QA a warning instead of an error for select packages. Otherwise, yes.. this should be an error. (The minor cases are primarily firmware loaded into off-board cards in PCI chasis and such.. occasionally these firmware are ELF and of an architecture not the same as the host.. it's rare, but I have seen it before.) --Mark > regards, > > Koen > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core