From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4DFF78AA.9050904@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:43:22 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4DFB869F.9080006@domain.hid> <4DFB88EC.9090100@domain.hid> <4DFBA305.9000303@domain.hid> <4DFC7C0E.1090700@domain.hid> <4DFC9575.1030904@domain.hid> <4DFC95B7.8070703@domain.hid> <4DFCA09B.20609@domain.hid> <4DFCA323.6030704@domain.hid> <4DFCA432.3070203@domain.hid> <4DFCAF07.8020607@domain.hid> <4DFE189D.5030908@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4DFE189D.5030908@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-git] Jan Kiszka : nucleus: Fix interrupt handler tails List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: Xenomai core On 2011-06-19 17:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Merged your whole branch, but took the liberty to change it a bit > (replacing the commit concerning unlocked context switches with comments > changes only, and changing the commit about xntbase_tick). What makes splmax() redundant for the unlocked context switch case? IMO that bug is still present. We can clean up xnintr_clock_handler a bit after the changes, will follow up with a patch. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux