From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4DFFA27F.3020808@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:41:51 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4DFB869F.9080006@domain.hid> <4DFB88EC.9090100@domain.hid> <4DFBA305.9000303@domain.hid> <4DFC7C0E.1090700@domain.hid> <4DFC9575.1030904@domain.hid> <4DFC95B7.8070703@domain.hid> <4DFCA09B.20609@domain.hid> <4DFCA323.6030704@domain.hid> <4DFCA432.3070203@domain.hid> <4DFCAF07.8020607@domain.hid> <4DFE189D.5030908@domain.hid> <4DFF78AA.9050904@domain.hid> <4DFF8476.2000306@domain.hid> <4DFFA19C.30000@domain.hid> <4DFFA24F.4050601@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4DFFA24F.4050601@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig187B516576259E50EB777332" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-git] Jan Kiszka : nucleus: Fix interrupt handler tails List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: Xenomai core This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig187B516576259E50EB777332 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-06-20 21:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 06/20/2011 09:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2011-06-20 19:33, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> On 06/20/2011 06:43 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> On 2011-06-19 17:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>>> Merged your whole branch, but took the liberty to change it a bit >>>>> (replacing the commit concerning unlocked context switches with com= ments >>>>> changes only, and changing the commit about xntbase_tick). >>>> >>>> What makes splmax() redundant for the unlocked context switch case? = IMO >>>> that bug is still present. >>> >>> No, the bug is between my keyboard and chair. On architectures with >>> unlocked context switches, the Linux task switch still happens with i= rqs >>> off, only the mm switch happens with irqs on. >> >> Then why do we call xnlock_get_irqsave in >> xnsched_finish_unlocked_switch? Why not simply xnlock_get if irqs are >> off anyway? >=20 > Because of the Xenomai task switch, not the Linux task switch. --verbose please. Jan --------------enig187B516576259E50EB777332 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3/on8ACgkQitSsb3rl5xR+qQCfYqVPIIQLnVU6r5Er5fwrFRFv ZPkAn2yEnlbc3siZ3BJSxBuBlTa1wSy0 =nSb7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig187B516576259E50EB777332--