From: Chris Dalton <cid@hp.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/DMI: use proper structures in favor of byte offsets
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:48:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0068F5.80206@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E006C0B02000078000486ED@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Hi Jan,
Not a comment on the patch changes directly but on the code covered by
the patch: in my experience on some EFI bioses you can't assume that the
SMBIOS tables are in a region beginning 0xF0000. The location needs to
be retrieved from the EFI system table, but I guess you have this in hand.
Chris
On 21/06/11 09:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Besides being (in my eyes) desirable cleanup, this at once represents
> another prerequisite for native EFI booting support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich<jbeulich@novell.com>
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c
> @@ -10,11 +10,31 @@
> #include<asm/system.h>
> #include<xen/dmi.h>
>
> -#define bt_ioremap(b,l) ((u8 *)__acpi_map_table(b,l))
> +#define bt_ioremap(b,l) ((void *)__acpi_map_table(b,l))
> #define bt_iounmap(b,l) ((void)0)
> #define memcpy_fromio memcpy
> #define alloc_bootmem(l) xmalloc_bytes(l)
>
> +struct dmi_eps {
> + char anchor[5]; /* "_DMI_" */
> + u8 checksum;
> + u16 size;
> + u32 address;
> + u16 num_structures;
> + u8 revision;
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> +struct smbios_eps {
> + char anchor[4]; /* "_SM_" */
> + u8 checksum;
> + u8 length;
> + u8 major, minor;
> + u16 max_size;
> + u8 revision;
> + u8 _rsrvd_[5];
> + struct dmi_eps dmi;
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> struct dmi_header
> {
> u8 type;
> @@ -90,62 +110,70 @@ static int __init dmi_table(u32 base, in
> }
>
>
> -inline static int __init dmi_checksum(u8 *buf)
> +static inline bool_t __init dmi_checksum(const void __iomem *buf,
> + unsigned int len)
> {
> - u8 sum=0;
> - int a;
> + u8 sum = 0;
> + const u8 *p = buf;
> + unsigned int a;
>
> - for(a=0; a<15; a++)
> - sum+=buf[a];
> - return (sum==0);
> + for (a = 0; a< len; a++)
> + sum += p[a];
> + return sum == 0;
> }
>
> int __init dmi_get_table(u32 *base, u32 *len)
> {
> - u8 buf[15];
> + struct dmi_eps eps;
> char __iomem *p, *q;
>
> p = maddr_to_virt(0xF0000);
> for (q = p; q< p + 0x10000; q += 16) {
> - memcpy_fromio(buf, q, 15);
> - if (memcmp(buf, "_DMI_", 5)==0&& dmi_checksum(buf)) {
> - *base=buf[11]<<24|buf[10]<<16|buf[9]<<8|buf[8];
> - *len=buf[7]<<8|buf[6];
> + memcpy_fromio(&eps, q, 15);
> + if (memcmp(eps.anchor, "_DMI_", 5) == 0&&
> + dmi_checksum(&eps, sizeof(eps))) {
> + *base = eps.address;
> + *len = eps.size;
> return 0;
> }
> }
> return -1;
> }
>
> +static int __init _dmi_iterate(const struct dmi_eps *dmi,
> + const struct smbios_eps __iomem *smbios,
> + void (*decode)(struct dmi_header *))
> +{
> + u16 num = dmi->num_structures;
> + u16 len = dmi->size;
> + u32 base = dmi->address;
> +
> + /*
> + * DMI version 0.0 means that the real version is taken from
> + * the SMBIOS version, which we may not know at this point.
> + */
> + if (dmi->revision)
> + printk(KERN_INFO "DMI %d.%d present.\n",
> + dmi->revision>> 4, dmi->revision& 0x0f);
> + else if (!smbios)
> + printk(KERN_INFO "DMI present.\n");
> + dmi_printk((KERN_INFO "%d structures occupying %d bytes.\n",
> + num, len));
> + dmi_printk((KERN_INFO "DMI table at 0x%08X.\n", base));
> + return dmi_table(base, len, num, decode);
> +}
> +
> static int __init dmi_iterate(void (*decode)(struct dmi_header *))
> {
> - u8 buf[15];
> + struct dmi_eps eps;
> char __iomem *p, *q;
>
> p = maddr_to_virt(0xF0000);
> for (q = p; q< p + 0x10000; q += 16) {
> - memcpy_fromio(buf, q, 15);
> - if (memcmp(buf, "_DMI_", 5)==0&& dmi_checksum(buf)) {
> - u16 num=buf[13]<<8|buf[12];
> - u16 len=buf[7]<<8|buf[6];
> - u32 base=buf[11]<<24|buf[10]<<16|buf[9]<<8|buf[8];
> -
> - /*
> - * DMI version 0.0 means that the real version is taken from
> - * the SMBIOS version, which we don't know at this point.
> - */
> - if(buf[14]!=0)
> - printk(KERN_INFO "DMI %d.%d present.\n",
> - buf[14]>>4, buf[14]&0x0F);
> - else
> - printk(KERN_INFO "DMI present.\n");
> - dmi_printk((KERN_INFO "%d structures occupying %d bytes.\n",
> - num, len));
> - dmi_printk((KERN_INFO "DMI table at 0x%08X.\n",
> - base));
> - if(dmi_table(base,len, num, decode)==0)
> - return 0;
> - }
> + memcpy_fromio(&eps, q, sizeof(eps));
> + if (memcmp(eps.anchor, "_DMI_", 5) == 0&&
> + dmi_checksum(&eps, sizeof(eps)))
> + return _dmi_iterate(&eps, NULL, decode);
> }
> return -1;
> }
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
--
+44(0)7827 233109
Registered No: 690597 (Hewlett-Packard Ltd)
Registered Office: Cain Rd, Bracknell, Berks, RG12 1HN, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-21 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 8:01 [PATCH] x86/DMI: use proper structures in favor of byte offsets Jan Beulich
2011-06-21 9:48 ` Chris Dalton [this message]
2011-06-21 10:02 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0068F5.80206@hp.com \
--to=cid@hp.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.