From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI _OSC support
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:21:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0151A0.90505@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110621132256.GB4902@srcf.ucam.org>
On 06/21/2011 09:22 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:16:27PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>
>> + rc = apei_osc_setup();
>> + if (rc)
>> + pr_info(GHES_PFX "Evaluate APEI _OSC failed!\n");
>
> Hm. This is maybe a little strong. It'd be valid for a machine to return
> an error here but still have the GHES functionality enabled via the
> generic call, but this message would still show up and potentially
> confuse the user. Can we keep a flag to check whether the generic method
> gave us control, and only give the error if both fail to enable it?
At least on some of my testing machine, generic _OSC call will not
return any error even it does not support APEI bit. So I think
sometimes it may be helpful to printk something here. To avoid
confusion, can we change the message as follow.
- generic _OSC succeeded, APEI _OSC failed: APEI firmware first mode is
enabled by APEI bit.
- generic _OSC failed, APEI _OSC succeeded: APEI firmware first mode is
enabled by APEI _OSC.
- both succeeded: APEI firmware first mode is enabled by APEI bit and
APEI _OSC.
- both failed: Failed to enable APEI firmware first mode!
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 7:16 [PATCH 0/4] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI related _OSC support Huang Ying
2011-06-21 7:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI, APEI, GHES, Prevent GHES to be built as module Huang Ying
2011-06-21 7:23 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-21 7:30 ` Huang Ying
2011-06-21 13:18 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-21 13:23 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-21 7:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI, APEI, GHES, Support disable GHES at boot time Huang Ying
2011-06-21 7:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI bit support in generic _OSC call Huang Ying
2011-06-21 7:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI _OSC support Huang Ying
2011-06-21 13:22 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-22 2:21 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2011-06-22 15:49 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0151A0.90505@intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.