From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 16/22] KVM: MMU: introduce the rules to modify shadow page table
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:34:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E01FD7B.1030505@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E01FBC9.3020009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Introduce some interfaces to modify spte as linux kernel does:
- mmu_spte_clear_track_bits, it set the spte from present to nonpresent, and
track the stat bits(accessed/dirty) of spte
- mmu_spte_clear_no_track, the same as mmu_spte_clear_track_bits except
tracking the stat bits
- mmu_spte_set, set spte from nonpresent to present
- mmu_spte_update, only update the stat bits
Now, it does not allowed to set spte from present to present, later, we can
drop the atomicly opration for X86_32 host, and it is the preparing work to
get spte on X86_32 host out of the mmu lock
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 4fe1cb3..5ceb64a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -299,12 +299,30 @@ static bool spte_is_bit_cleared(u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, u64 bit_mask)
return (old_spte & bit_mask) && !(new_spte & bit_mask);
}
-static void update_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
+/* Rules for using mmu_spte_set:
+ * Set the sptep from nonpresent to present.
+ * Note: the sptep being assigned *must* be either not present
+ * or in a state where the hardware will not attempt to update
+ * the spte.
+ */
+static void mmu_spte_set(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
+{
+ WARN_ON(is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep));
+ __set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
+}
+
+/* Rules for using mmu_spte_update:
+ * Update the state bits, it means the mapped pfn is not changged.
+ */
+static void mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
{
u64 mask, old_spte = *sptep;
WARN_ON(!is_rmap_spte(new_spte));
+ if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
+ return mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte);
+
new_spte |= old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask;
mask = shadow_accessed_mask;
@@ -325,6 +343,42 @@ static void update_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
kvm_set_pfn_dirty(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
}
+/*
+ * Rules for using mmu_spte_clear_track_bits:
+ * It sets the sptep from present to nonpresent, and track the
+ * state bits, it is used to clear the last level sptep.
+ */
+static int mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ pfn_t pfn;
+ u64 old_spte = *sptep;
+
+ if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
+ __set_spte(sptep, 0ull);
+ else
+ old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, 0ull);
+
+ if (!is_rmap_spte(old_spte))
+ return 0;
+
+ pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
+ if (!shadow_accessed_mask || old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
+ kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
+ if (!shadow_dirty_mask || (old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask))
+ kvm_set_pfn_dirty(pfn);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Rules for using mmu_spte_clear_no_track:
+ * Directly clear spte without caring the state bits of sptep,
+ * it is used to set the upper level spte.
+ */
+static void mmu_spte_clear_no_track(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ __set_spte(sptep, 0ull);
+}
+
static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
struct kmem_cache *base_cache, int min)
{
@@ -746,30 +800,9 @@ static void rmap_remove(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte)
pte_list_remove(spte, rmapp);
}
-static int set_spte_track_bits(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
-{
- pfn_t pfn;
- u64 old_spte = *sptep;
-
- if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
- __set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
- else
- old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, new_spte);
-
- if (!is_rmap_spte(old_spte))
- return 0;
-
- pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
- if (!shadow_accessed_mask || old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
- kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
- if (!shadow_dirty_mask || (old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask))
- kvm_set_pfn_dirty(pfn);
- return 1;
-}
-
static void drop_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
{
- if (set_spte_track_bits(sptep, 0ull))
+ if (mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(sptep))
rmap_remove(kvm, sptep);
}
@@ -787,7 +820,7 @@ static int rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gfn)
BUG_ON(!(*spte & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
rmap_printk("rmap_write_protect: spte %p %llx\n", spte, *spte);
if (is_writable_pte(*spte)) {
- update_spte(spte, *spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
+ mmu_spte_update(spte, *spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
write_protected = 1;
}
spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
@@ -856,7 +889,8 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
new_spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
new_spte &= ~SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
new_spte &= ~shadow_accessed_mask;
- set_spte_track_bits(spte, new_spte);
+ mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(spte);
+ mmu_spte_set(spte, new_spte);
spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
}
}
@@ -1077,7 +1111,7 @@ static void drop_parent_pte(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
u64 *parent_pte)
{
mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(sp, parent_pte);
- __set_spte(parent_pte, 0ull);
+ mmu_spte_clear_no_track(parent_pte);
}
static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -1525,7 +1559,7 @@ static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
spte = __pa(sp->spt)
| PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_ACCESSED_MASK
| PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK;
- __set_spte(sptep, spte);
+ mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
}
static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
@@ -1992,7 +2026,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
mark_page_dirty(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
set_pte:
- update_spte(sptep, spte);
+ mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
/*
* If we overwrite a writable spte with a read-only one we
* should flush remote TLBs. Otherwise rmap_write_protect
@@ -2198,11 +2232,11 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
return -ENOMEM;
}
- __set_spte(iterator.sptep,
- __pa(sp->spt)
- | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK
- | shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask
- | shadow_accessed_mask);
+ mmu_spte_set(iterator.sptep,
+ __pa(sp->spt)
+ | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK
+ | shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask
+ | shadow_accessed_mask);
}
}
return emulate;
@@ -3449,7 +3483,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
/* avoid RMW */
if (is_writable_pte(pt[i]))
- update_spte(&pt[i], pt[i] & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
+ mmu_spte_update(&pt[i],
+ pt[i] & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
}
}
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 14:27 [PATCH v2 0/22] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] KVM: MMU: fix walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 17:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-23 2:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-27 6:35 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] KVM: MMU: do not update slot bitmap if spte is nonpresent Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] KVM: x86: fix broken read emulation spans a page boundary Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 8:21 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 10:53 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:19 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] KVM: x86: introduce vcpu_gva_to_gpa to cleanup the code Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 8:24 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 10:56 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:09 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-06-22 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] KVM: x86: abstract the operation for read/write emulation Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 8:37 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 10:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] KVM: x86: cleanup the code of " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] KVM: MMU: cache mmio info on page fault path Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 8:48 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:09 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] KVM: MMU: optimize to handle dirty bit Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] KVM: MMU: cleanup for FNAME(fetch) Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] KVM: MMU: rename 'pt_write' to 'emulate' Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] KVM: MMU: count used shadow pages on prepareing path Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_free_page Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] KVM: MMU: remove bypass_guest_pf Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] KVM: MMU: filter out the mmio pfn from the fault pfn Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] KVM: MMU: abstract some functions to handle " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:34 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2011-06-22 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] KVM: MMU: clean up spte updating and clearing Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: MMU: do not need atomicly to set/clear spte Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] KVM: MMU: lockless walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 9:16 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:18 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 12:18 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 12:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 12:27 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 12:39 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 13:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 13:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] KVM: MMU: reorganize struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] KVM: MMU: mmio page fault support Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 21:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-23 3:19 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-23 6:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-23 14:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-23 17:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-23 20:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-24 2:04 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-26 8:42 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-27 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 9:22 ` [PATCH v2 " Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 12:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] KVM: MMU: trace mmio page fault Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/22] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E01FD7B.1030505@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.