From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6934C8005F for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:47:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5N2kh0Y012365 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:46:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bruce-ashfields-macbook.local (128.224.21.254) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:46:43 -0700 Message-ID: <4E02A911.9060701@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:46:41 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110613 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NiQingliang References: <1308794126.28060.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1308794126.28060.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: the mpc8315's compile option X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:47:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11-06-22 9:55 PM, NiQingliang wrote: > mpc8315's core is e300c3, why use "tune-ppc603e.inc"? The 603e represented a lowest common denominator tune file when the BSP was introduced, and it was available in poky at the time. We simply haven't revisited the tuning for the BSP yet, since what we have works at the moment. > > I think there should be an file named "tune-ppce300c3.inc"? I can find > it in openembedded. I'd definitely like to see patches that provide better tuning for this BSP. So patches are welcome. Although at the moment, I'm not aware of any plans to revisit the tuning. Perhaps you'd like to log this as an enhancement request in the yocto bugzilla ? That way we can be sure that it isn't forgotten. Cheers, Bruce > >