All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	dmilburn@redhat.com, jack_wang@usish.com,
	Jeff Skirvin <jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com>,
	yuxiangl@marvell.com, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] isci: filter broadcast change notifications during SMP phy resets
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:59:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E08A8FD.5080305@interlog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0894EC.2010509@suse.de>

On 11-06-27 10:34 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 06/24/2011 09:48 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> From: Jeff Skirvin<jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com>
>>
>> When resetting a sata device in the domain we have seen occasions where
>> libsas prematurely marks a device gone in the time it takes for the
>> device to re-establish the link. This plays badly with software raid
>> arrays. Other libsas drivers have non-uniform delays in their reset
>> handlers to try to cover this condition, but not sufficient to close the
>> hole. Given that a sata device can take many seconds to recover we
>> filter bcns and poll for the device reattach state before notifying
>> libsas that the port needs the domain to be rediscovered. Once this has
>> been proven out at the lldd level we can think about uplevelling this
>> feature to a common implementation in libsas.
>>
> That's the second time something like this have come up now.
> Wouldn't it makes sense to implement something like the dev_loss_tmo mechanism
> with have for FC? That should cover this situation nicely ...

"NOTE 112 - An STP initiator port should retry connection
requests for at least the time indicated by the STP
SMP I_T NEXUS LOSS TIME field in the SMP REPORT GENERAL
response for the STP target port to which it is trying to
establish a connection." [spl2r01.pdf 9.4.3.18 page 612]

The recommended value for that field is 2000 (i.e. 2 seconds).
So 2 seconds is not enough in some circumstances?

If so, then writing a larger value to the corresponding field
in the SMP CONFIGURE GENERAL request should stop a SAS-2
self-configuring expander generating a premature Broadcast(Change)
after a SATA disk reset with a SMP PHY CONTROL request.

For SAS-1.1 expanders the LLDD or libsas needs to handle
this case.

Doug Gilbert




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-27 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-24 19:48 [RFC PATCH] isci: filter broadcast change notifications during SMP phy resets Dan Williams
2011-06-27 14:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-06-27 14:49   ` Brian King
2011-06-27 15:59   ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2011-06-27 16:27     ` Dan Williams
2011-06-27 16:02   ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E08A8FD.5080305@interlog.com \
    --to=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dmilburn@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack_wang@usish.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuxiangl@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.