All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Update 252 Golden Output
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:03:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E09ED36.2040903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E09D735.5060000@redhat.com>

On 06/28/2011 06:29 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 6/28/11 12:26 AM, Allison Henderson wrote:
>> On 06/27/2011 10:09 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 09:27:26PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
>>>> New filtered golden output for test 252
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson<achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> :100644 100644 930c924... fcfd121... M    252.out
>>>>    252.out |  272 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>>>>    1 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/252.out b/252.out
>>>> index 930c924..fcfd121 100644
>>>> --- a/252.out
>>>> +++ b/252.out
>>>> @@ -1,239 +1,307 @@
>>>>    QA output created by 252
>>>>        1. into a hole
>>>> +daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
>>>>        2. into allocated space
>>>> -0: [0..7]: data
>>>> +0: [0..7]: extent
>>>>    1: [8..23]: hole
>>>> -2: [24..39]: data
>>>> +2: [24..39]: extent
>>>> +cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
>>>
>>> I don't really like the way this weakens the test for XFS. With this
>>> change, the test no longer is checking that unwritten extent
>>> behaviour is correct.
>>>
>>> Rather than weakening the test, perhaps it would be better to
>>> execute 252 for XFS only (with the md5sums added), and then
>>> duplicate it to a new test for all filesystems to run with the
>>> weaker result checking that using the new filter function gives us.
>>> With the amount of common code the two tests share, it should be
>>> trivial to do this....
>>>
>>
>> Alrighty, that sounds pretty straight forward, as long as every one
>> is in agreement. I think that would help retain the tests
>> effectiveness. Eric, Josef, what are your thoughts?
>
> Yeah, I agree, I share Dave's concerns and that sounds like a good
> way to go.
>
> Thanks,
> -Eric

Ok I will get an update sent out with these adjustments, and also the 
checksum wrapper that Dave mentioned in the 1/3 patch.  Thanks all
for your reviews!

Allison Henderson

>
>> Allison Henderson
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Update 252 Golden Output
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:03:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E09ED36.2040903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E09D735.5060000@redhat.com>

On 06/28/2011 06:29 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 6/28/11 12:26 AM, Allison Henderson wrote:
>> On 06/27/2011 10:09 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 09:27:26PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
>>>> New filtered golden output for test 252
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson<achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> :100644 100644 930c924... fcfd121... M    252.out
>>>>    252.out |  272 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>>>>    1 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/252.out b/252.out
>>>> index 930c924..fcfd121 100644
>>>> --- a/252.out
>>>> +++ b/252.out
>>>> @@ -1,239 +1,307 @@
>>>>    QA output created by 252
>>>>        1. into a hole
>>>> +daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
>>>>        2. into allocated space
>>>> -0: [0..7]: data
>>>> +0: [0..7]: extent
>>>>    1: [8..23]: hole
>>>> -2: [24..39]: data
>>>> +2: [24..39]: extent
>>>> +cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
>>>
>>> I don't really like the way this weakens the test for XFS. With this
>>> change, the test no longer is checking that unwritten extent
>>> behaviour is correct.
>>>
>>> Rather than weakening the test, perhaps it would be better to
>>> execute 252 for XFS only (with the md5sums added), and then
>>> duplicate it to a new test for all filesystems to run with the
>>> weaker result checking that using the new filter function gives us.
>>> With the amount of common code the two tests share, it should be
>>> trivial to do this....
>>>
>>
>> Alrighty, that sounds pretty straight forward, as long as every one
>> is in agreement. I think that would help retain the tests
>> effectiveness. Eric, Josef, what are your thoughts?
>
> Yeah, I agree, I share Dave's concerns and that sounds like a good
> way to go.
>
> Thanks,
> -Eric

Ok I will get an update sent out with these adjustments, and also the 
checksum wrapper that Dave mentioned in the 1/3 patch.  Thanks all
for your reviews!

Allison Henderson

>
>> Allison Henderson
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-28 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-28  4:27 [PATCH 0/3 v2] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 failure Allison Henderson
2011-06-28  4:27 ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-28  4:27 ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Relax fiemap filter Allison Henderson
2011-06-28  4:27   ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-28  4:59   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-28  4:59     ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-28  5:17     ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-28  5:17       ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-28  8:49       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-28  4:27 ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Update 252 Golden Output Allison Henderson
2011-06-28  4:27   ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-28  5:09   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-28  5:09     ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-28  5:26     ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-28  5:26       ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-28 13:29       ` Eric Sandeen
2011-06-28 13:29         ` Eric Sandeen
2011-06-28 15:03         ` Allison Henderson [this message]
2011-06-28 15:03           ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-28  4:27 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Update 242 " Allison Henderson
2011-06-28  4:27   ` Allison Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E09ED36.2040903@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.