From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbbxo-0004Ij-OZ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:20:40 +0200 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1QbbuE-0002lh-AO from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:16:58 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:16:58 -0700 Received: from [172.30.80.197] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:16:57 -0700 Message-ID: <4E0A0C85.80103@mentor.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:16:53 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2011 17:16:58.0168 (UTC) FILETIME=[2FA74380:01CC35B7] Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] Fix parse errors X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:20:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/28/2011 09:54 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 13:49, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> Can you describe a use case? >> >> Rolling out a fix for the generic package without having to rebuild it N >> times. > > When doing this fix you should bump PR, right? in this case, this will > be (or ought to be) rebuild for all machines thus for me seems it will > be the same end result. It will be, yes. What Koen is saying is that if you're a feed using distribution you don't NEED to kick off the build for N machines, just N architectures (since you can use sysvinit-getty-r2 and sysvinit-r3 just fine, if there weren't any changes to the getty subpackage). -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation