From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Wright Subject: Re: irqbalance segfaults Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:54:00 -0700 Message-ID: <4E0B3C88.4090708@mail.theorb.net> References: <4E0A596C.1090509@mailinator.com> <4E0A5E7D.6020909@daevel.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4E0A5E7D.6020909@daevel.fr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Olivier B." Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/28/2011 04:06 PM, Olivier B. wrote: > Hi, > > it's an irqbalance bug, because of the directory /proc/irq/0 which > doesn't exists under Xen PV. > See the Debian report about that : > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517183 > > Ana will package the fix soon for Debian Squeeze (backports ?), but > which distribution are you using ? Follow up: I checked and on fedora 14 there exists /proc/irq/0. Distributed version is irqbalance-0.56-1. Perhaps the segfault is a result of something else?