From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: riel@surriel.com (Rik van Riel)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:42:56 -0400
Subject: Gmail complaining about authenticity of emails sent/received
	via kernelnewbies
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=1+HHUbOLbaW-OvAerMfLZ4K5mUg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinSLR-h1FhVX8HGp6MPaTm+yGp5Mg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=D0wrpdDs1F3i=64SYuYkWMnyEdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinp6F9_AYwj0SpUgS_pXX4GRAz+Rw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E0B1E56.7090602@surriel.com>
	<BANLkTimgkfm5-LcS5EbKzxAjmsDX_=kF2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E0B38BD.1090201@surriel.com>
	<BANLkTi=1+HHUbOLbaW-OvAerMfLZ4K5mUg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4E0B7230.4020300@surriel.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On 06/29/2011 01:19 PM, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> Hi Rik...
>
> Long time no chat :)
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 21:37, Rik van Riel<riel@surriel.com>  wrote:
>> You've got to be kidding me.
>>
>> SPF is fundamentally flawed in so many ways, noone should
>> be recommending it in this day and age.
>
> So, what do you recommend about this issue? Should we just bear with it?

At some point I will upgrade kernelnewbies.org to a RHEL 6
virtual machine, with newer versions of everything.

Right now I am very busy with other things though, so it'll
be a few months before I get around to it...

-- 
All rights reversed.