From: "Karsten Römke" <k.roemke@gmx.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: misunderstanding of spare and raid devices? - and one question more
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:21:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0C8685.3020806@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0C7B4B.7090404@turmel.org>
Hi Phil
>
> If your CPU has free cycles, I suggest you run raid6 instead of raid5+spare.
>
> Phil
>
I started the raid 6 array and get:
Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid6 sde5[4] sdd5[3] sdc5[2] sdb2[1] sda3[0]
13759296 blocks level 6, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU]
[=================>...] resync = 87.4% (4013184/4586432) finish=0.4min speed=20180K/sec
when I started the raid 5 array I get
md0 : active raid5 sdd5[4] sde5[5](S) sdc5[2] sdb2[1] sda3[0]
13759296 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3] [UUU_]
[=>...................] recovery = 6.2% (286656/4586432) finish=0.9min speed=71664K/sec
so I have to expect a three times less write speed - or is this calculation
to simple ?
Karsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-30 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-30 10:51 misunderstanding of spare and raid devices? Karsten Römke
2011-06-30 10:58 ` Robin Hill
2011-06-30 13:09 ` Karsten Römke
2011-06-30 11:30 ` John Robinson
2011-06-30 12:32 ` Phil Turmel
2011-06-30 12:52 ` misunderstanding of spare and raid devices? - and one question more Karsten Römke
2011-06-30 13:34 ` Phil Turmel
2011-06-30 14:05 ` Karsten Römke
2011-06-30 14:21 ` Karsten Römke [this message]
2011-06-30 14:44 ` Phil Turmel
2011-07-02 8:34 ` Karsten Römke
2011-07-02 9:42 ` David Brown
2011-06-30 21:28 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-01 7:23 ` David Brown
2011-07-01 8:50 ` Robin Hill
2011-07-01 10:18 ` David Brown
2011-07-01 11:29 ` Robin Hill
2011-07-01 12:45 ` David Brown
2011-07-01 13:02 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0C8685.3020806@gmx.de \
--to=k.roemke@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.