From: "Nicolas de Pesloüan" <nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, kaber@trash.net,
fubar@us.ibm.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net,
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch net-next-2.6] net: allow multiple rx_handler registration
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:50:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0CD39C.8060209@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309447009-8898-1-git-send-email-jpirko@redhat.com>
Le 30/06/2011 17:16, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> For some net topos it is necessary to have multiple "soft-net-devices"
> hooked on one netdev. For example very common is to have
> eth<->(br+vlan). Vlan is not using rh_handler (yet) but also for example
> macvlan would be useful to have hooked on same netdev as br.
>
> This patch introduces rx_handler list. size struct net_device stays
> intact. Measured performance regression on eth-br topo is ~1% (on received
> pkts generated by pktgen) and on eth-bond topo it is ~0.25%
>
> On br I think that the performance can be brought back maybe by using per-cpu
> variables to store port in rx_path (I must check this)
>
> Please comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko<jpirko@redhat.com>
I like the idea of this patch.
I didn't take time for a technical review yet, but I'm not sure ordering should be static, depending
on the kind of device (bond, br, macvlan). Ordering is currently static, because it is hard coded.
I think rx_handler_prio should be exposed to userspace, to allow user setup to decide the exact
order. Default order should be safe, but user should be allowed to force a different order for
special setups.
Nicolas.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-30 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-30 15:16 [RFC patch net-next-2.6] net: allow multiple rx_handler registration Jiri Pirko
2011-06-30 16:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-06-30 17:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-06-30 17:29 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-30 17:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-07-01 6:36 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-07-01 14:57 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-07-01 15:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-07-01 15:01 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-07-01 16:45 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-07-01 16:49 ` Ben Greear
2011-07-01 16:58 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-07-01 17:08 ` David Lamparter
2011-07-01 17:50 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-06-30 18:13 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-30 18:28 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-06-30 18:53 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-30 19:50 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan [this message]
2011-07-01 5:45 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-07-01 16:55 ` David Lamparter
2011-07-01 12:48 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0CD39C.8060209@gmail.com \
--to=nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.