From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
MartinSchwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] kprobes: Add separate preempt_disabling for kprobes
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:52:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0D285A.7040000@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309484297.26417.126.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
(2011/07/01 10:38), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [ Added some of the affected maintainers, left off David Howells and
> David Miller due to LKML Cc limit ]
>
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:22 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2011/07/01 6:56), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 11:51 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> To solve this, I've added a per_cpu variable called
>>>> kprobe_preempt_disabled, that is set by the kprobe code. If it is set,
>>>> the preempt_schedule() will not preempt the code.
>>
>> Sorry for replying so late :(
>
> Heh, who can blame you? Timezones make open source development a
> wait-and-see affair.
Yeah, we can't go over light speed.
>>> Damn this is ugly. Can we step back and see if we can make the
>>> requirement for kprobe to disable preemption go away?
>>
>> As I replied right now, I think we can just eliminate that
>> disabling preemption code. At least we'd better try it.
>> I agree with you, introducing this kind of complexity
>> just for kprobes is not what I want. :(
>
> Note, I did clean up this patch, so it is not as fugly.
Hm, I think you don't need to introduce new flag for that
purpose, there is current_kprobe and kprobe status flag.
if (kprobe_running() &&
get_kprobe_ctlblk()->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SS)
/*Running under kprobe's single stepping*/
But I'm not sure that is there any code which can run
under TF=1. (maybe NMI code? but it would not cause preemption)
>>> Why does it have to do that anyway? Isn't it keeping enough per-task
>>> state to allow preemption over the single step?
>>
>> preemption itself must not happen on single stepping, but it seems
>> impossible to do heavy context switching with setting TF bit...
>
> Yeah, if all archs single step with interrupts disabled, then we should
> be fine with removing preemption.
OK, I'll check that.
Thank you ;)
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-01 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-30 13:23 [BUG] kprobes crashing because of preempt count Steven Rostedt
2011-06-30 15:51 ` [RFC][PATCH] kprobes: Add separate preempt_disabling for kprobes Steven Rostedt
2011-06-30 16:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-30 16:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-30 19:40 ` Jason Baron
2011-06-30 19:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-30 21:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-01 1:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-07-01 1:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-01 1:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2011-07-01 5:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-07-01 11:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-07-01 12:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-01 12:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-01 13:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-07-01 13:14 ` [RFC PATCH -tip ] [BUGFIX] x86: Remove preempt disabling from kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2011-07-01 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-01 13:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-03 2:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-07-02 6:09 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2011-07-01 1:12 ` [BUG] kprobes crashing because of preempt count Masami Hiramatsu
2011-07-01 1:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-01 2:23 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-07-01 11:36 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2011-07-01 12:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-07-01 13:03 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2011-07-01 13:19 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0D285A.7040000@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.