From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QdLoo-0002aG-Sp for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 14:30:35 +0200 Received: (qmail 24532 invoked by uid 1003); 3 Jul 2011 12:26:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.0.61?) (philip@opensdr.com@87.192.231.145) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 3 Jul 2011 12:26:46 -0000 Message-ID: <4E106004.7030103@balister.org> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 13:26:44 +0100 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <7848FD2A-860F-48C3-BE1D-739C6D9AB0A8@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <7848FD2A-860F-48C3-BE1D-739C6D9AB0A8@dominion.thruhere.net> Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: Re: Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 12:30:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/29/2011 09:56 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > That's already the case now. The problem is the PROVIDES overlap since the Poky people decided a distro could only have one true ssh implementation instead of choosing it per image. So if your distro doesn't set the PREFERRED_PROVIDER_sshd you get those nagging messages during parsing that scare users and make consultants rich. > What's wrong with consultants getting rich? Philip